but i think we have the voting power to remove every last one of the suckers.
2007-12-17 17:16:30 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Although the new rascals may be as bad they should never be allowed to stay so long. For the foreseeable future it would be wise to limit them to one term. Later, maybe two terms. For now, let us agree that it is time for them to go. Eventually some will follow the will of the people. Some will not grow rich in office if limited to one term. It is the sensible solution short of a revolution.
2007-12-17 17:55:55 · update #1
The President and Congress for the most part live in a bubble. They are so out of touch with the American People it isn't funny. I agree, vote them out. There are a few who do seem to be more in touch with reality, Tancredo and Hunter and probably some others.
2007-12-17 17:29:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't know about that. Being born into money makes one take it for granted, sort of like having perfect health. Some of the most miserable people I've met were rich. Does Britney Spears seem happy to you?
It's the power trip, even common folk get hooked on that. Do you think people like Al Capone were born rich? Honest or not politicos have the same mind trip, it's all about the quest of power.
2007-12-17 17:36:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pretty much. Most of our elected officials never had to work their way up from humble beginnings. They generally were born into elite families with untold numbers of political connections. What is missing in our modern day representatives is a common ground with those who got them elected. I'd give anything to see a working class joe beat them at their own game. Until then, it's just going to be the same old-same old.
To JPC:Two good cases in point. In Illinois we have a pair of very similar politicos...The two *****- Durbin and Daley!
2007-12-17 17:32:11 · answer #3 · answered by Dan K 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem is that you have places like California where Senators like Boxer and Feinstein get elected no matter how far left there policies are. You can do everything you can to change the congress person in your own district but you can't do anything about San Fransisco and Nancy Pelosi.
2007-12-17 17:35:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Being rich does indeed change people. But in and of itself, it does not guarantee corruption, vice, or or less-than-civil behavior toward "the masses." But when you combine primary character flaws with being rich, influential, privileged, AND "untouchable" because of the aforementioned factors, this mutates most humans into something which I am sure few of us would recognize: the "Elite." Let me put it this way: if you were worth billions, from a politically and financially influential family, and could buy or lie your way out of anything, would you seriously think of the "common people" the same way?
2007-12-17 17:32:30 · answer #5 · answered by enragedwombat 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The voters communicate out!!! cease the Republicans from stealing tax money. Bush has completed this his finished term, shall we not enable them to attain one massive one in the previous he gets the boot! guess you the GOP start up attempting to smear Obama any and each way achievable now. have not got self belief the lies, shop them out workplace, for the coolest of the human beings.
2016-12-11 08:21:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think money did that to them, They were that kind of people before.
When we vote the rascals out we will be voting new rascals in. Its always worked that way.
2007-12-17 17:25:19 · answer #7 · answered by paul 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
im rich biyatch
2007-12-17 17:46:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋