He should do something else that is important since he sure isn't going to be the GOP nominee!
The only place he's going is back to Texas, where he belongs!
2007-12-17 13:47:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
In the War on Drugs, we've done worse than in Iraq, Afghanistan, or Vietnam! The fact Paul's a physician might make some think he'd be better at it than others, but understanding an issue doesn't mean you're successful at implementing policy. In any event, many of our drug laws are stupid and we waste too much money incarcerating petty drug users/abusers.
2007-12-17 20:40:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by LEW 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
No, the war on drugs is useless, obviously. They've been fighting it for what, 30 years now?
2007-12-17 20:37:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
The very few followers of Ron Paul I actually spoke to gave money to him and they are literally on drugs. Why would he stop his supporters from doing drugs? The one time I actually heard Ron speak, he was slurring his words like my friends. Interesting.
2007-12-17 21:16:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
He has so many ideas that are being ignored by the MSM and by most Americans that he does not have time, nor would it be wise, to concentrate on just one of his major points.
2007-12-17 20:37:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lars 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
Yeah, Better drug war, than the real war.He would get us all
boomed, but not on drugs, More like nuked..
2007-12-17 20:57:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bee Bee 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
That's not nearly one of the most important issues like Iraq, Health Care, ect. that need to be addressed. i'm sure this is something that will get much more attention if and when he's president. let's be honest a huge portion of his supporters are teens/young adults who want the ganja legalized :)
2007-12-17 20:40:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
he will once he gets elected , just another reason to vote Ron Paul.
2007-12-17 20:36:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Better than what? It is part of his platform.
2007-12-17 20:38:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by doug4jets 7
·
7⤊
1⤋
If he was to be elected, he would have to convince the Senate and the Congress, to pass anything........And there simply arent enough Fanatical votes to accomplish anything except a four year Lame Duck President in Ron Pauls case.
2007-12-17 20:37:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Happy-go-Lucky 4
·
1⤊
10⤋