8 months ago (or even 6) it looked like a slam dunk, but now the more I look at the leading dems it looks like either would have trouble getting enough electorial votes....I kinda think the reps will win it again in 08...what ya think?
2007-12-17 12:19:11 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
When America realizes voting for Hillary or Barak means:
1. More taxes
2. More government
3. More regulation
4. Open borders \ Amnesty
5. Kyoto for America only
6. Surrender to Islamic Jihad
there is a good chance the public will "just say no"
2007-12-17 12:26:54 · answer #1 · answered by netjr 6 · 5⤊ 8⤋
Win it with what? Rotten Rudy? - no way, no chance - Romney? - no way the Repubs even nominate a Mormon - Thompson? - LOL - Huckabee? - the country has had enough of the religious far right, another one has no chance - that leaves McCain and any one of the major 3 Dems would kill him.
2007-12-17 13:02:45 · answer #2 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you got kicked in the head as a baby
Dems in '08 '12 and '16 too
2007-12-17 12:40:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. republicans will win The White House in '08 like bush & cheney will be awarded Congressional Medals of Honor for their combat service during vietnam.
2007-12-17 12:28:56 · answer #4 · answered by realvets_driveposeurscrazy 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
If something i think of that a President who stops using our militia as a farm animals prod to manage different countries would scale lower back the possibilities of any terrorist assaults. they don't hate us as a results of fact of our way of existence, they hate us as a results of fact our government tries to rule the international with an iron fist. i've got self assurance as though international relatives could certainly circulate an prolonged way if executed perfect. If shall we artwork with the governments of countries that abode terrorist communities, then shall we make it lots extra durable for those communities to function. lots of those communities have hassle-free avenues for recruiting and investment which would be stopped purely by using their government. reducing them off on the source is oftentimes lots extra effectual than turning over each log and seeing what falls out. playstation - Hillary isn't the respond. She's a political coward. be at liberty to vote for the different liberal candidate even with the incontrovertible fact that.
2016-10-11 12:12:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I pray the Democrats will win. Although they have not been as productive as I would have liked in the last year, I tremble and fear at the thought of anything that resembles another term of Bush thinking.
2007-12-17 12:32:32 · answer #6 · answered by Teacher 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You are kidding right?
It looks more like they are going to take what little chance they had and flush it down the can by nominating a religous fanatic like Huckabee instead of a moderate like McCain or Rudy
2007-12-17 12:32:01 · answer #7 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
As long as the Democrats are - 1 Running against Bush who is not on the ballot 2 running against the Iraq war which is going so much better that it has left the headlines 3 pushing left wing socialism, They are vulnerable.
2007-12-17 12:35:47 · answer #8 · answered by Michael 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Calm down. Sooner or later the Republican nominee will have to defend Bush's record of the past eight years, and we'll see how popular that is...
2007-12-17 12:28:47 · answer #9 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No way in Hell people are sick of the party that consistently puts corporate interests ahead of average Americans---across all programs both foreign and domestic
2007-12-17 12:23:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋