English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-17 12:02:06 · 9 answers · asked by *Olivia* :) 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

if it is not liberation theology then what is the correct answer??

2007-12-17 12:10:26 · update #1

9 answers

Just the fanatic kind! Not the regulars! Flower power!, Make love not War! Does that sound violent to you?

2007-12-17 12:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by Beau 6 · 1 3

That sounds like code speak rather than English. Could you expand upon what "a liberation theology" is, citing 2 examples, and providing a clear definition?

2007-12-17 20:05:32 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Vincent Van Jessup 6 · 1 2

Liberation theology does not advocate violence.

2007-12-17 20:04:47 · answer #3 · answered by CHEZ 3 · 0 2

Yep.Started in South America 40 years ago.It is a Social Gospel mixing communist marxism with Christian doctrine.

2007-12-17 21:57:09 · answer #4 · answered by Angel 5 · 0 0

That doesn't sound right. I don't think that's what a liberation theology is.

2007-12-17 20:05:01 · answer #5 · answered by John 5 · 0 2

Yes.it is predicated on Marxism and has caused untold damge in the world.

2007-12-17 20:18:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Violence must not be used to achieve political stability because it is barbarism and has no place in this modern world.

2007-12-17 20:06:33 · answer #7 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 3

*Liberation is an action,not theology.
Liberation for freedom from an oppressive Government has never been won by talking them to death.
It is inherently prone to violence for termination.

2007-12-17 20:11:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

violence? I guess that it is more the deliberate use of indifference.

2007-12-17 20:05:56 · answer #9 · answered by ....... 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers