We put them on notice and now we are waffling. Don't people realize the less committed we are to their destruction the more encourage they become?
2007-12-17 06:58:23 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah I do agree with Relax also.
2007-12-17 07:09:36 · update #1
I would not object to cleaning up the mess we made, but not with Bush and Chaney. We can not trust them to do the right thing. They have proved time and time again this is all about making themselves and their friends rich.
2007-12-17 07:07:53 · answer #1 · answered by RELAX 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
maybe it's to late to do the right thing.
we should have pursued Zawahri and Bin Laden into Pakistan when the trail was hot.
I'm not sure if Americans would support such an effort now.
Have you noticed that Zawahri is talked about even less than Bin Laden ?
Its like people don't even care about the real war on terror anymore
Not even the conservatives seem to give a crap.
bush f*cked things all up
2007-12-17 07:26:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the US went all out and unleashed the full fury of our military potential we'd kill more innocents than terrorists... sure we'd kill most of the current terrorists... but how many would that create for the future due to the deaths of innocents?
You don't win a war against ideology and tactics by brute force alone.
2007-12-17 07:04:09 · answer #3 · answered by pip 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, you can't commit yourself to fighting an army who are not on the battlefield. The terrorist knows that to put on a uniform is to make himself a target. The battlefield is only one factor in this war. To go "all out" is to infiltrate. Bombs and bullets are only a visual reference to this war. The real battlefield is in the "minds", or philosophys on each side.Equality and common goals are needed!
2007-12-17 07:15:56 · answer #4 · answered by zd_sr1 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think the war on terrorism must be fought but go all out..with who? I ts certainly time to think over our strategy and understand the root causes of Terrorism,as it is quite obvious
bullets are not helping !
2007-12-17 07:16:16 · answer #5 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uh, no.
I don't care about "commitment." Being committed to something stupid is no less *stupid* for the commitment; in fact, it's stupider. Which is why I don't understand people who say ... "Well, at least Bush *sticks to* his choices and convictions, even if they're stupid." LMAO. Yah, I'm really impressed when you make an idiotic decision and *stick to it* even after you realize it's idiotic!
2007-12-17 07:10:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No I don't agree. When WW3 happens, will you feel the same way? Bush started something he couldn't finish. Now he will leave office and leave the mess for someone else to clean up.
2007-12-17 07:01:39 · answer #7 · answered by anna 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
The waffling started when Bush decided that murderer Osama bin Laden had been "marginalized."
The War on Terror is a facade until the U.S. steps up full pursuit of murderer Osama bin Laden.
2007-12-17 07:02:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I think that is the plan. However, we can't differentiate them from regular citizens and we don't know where they are.
Maybe if we expanded our intelligence into their social networks and stopped relying on technology we'd actually get somewhere.
2007-12-17 07:01:39 · answer #9 · answered by Pfo 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
hope u r not a hypocrite?
r u talking home 1st then away.
we gotta clean up our own house b4 we talk of another's.
2007-12-17 07:02:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋