If it was "acceptable" to have children without being married, would you have become married?

Answer 1

I certainly didn't get married to have children. I got married because I love my husband and want to share life with him. I've been married almost 3 years, and have no intentions on having kids for another 4 years or so.

Answer 2

First, I think it very nearly is acceptable, so long as you do right by the other person and the child. Of course I live in NY, I imagine in some other countries, states, or cities it is still heartily condemned to have a bastard.

Second, I did have a child without marrying. It was a tempestuous relationship. I saw my daughter as much as possible and provided a very fair amount of financial support towards her expenses and her mother's general expenses. Eventually we got back together and we did marry, primarily (for me) to just make a "proper" family for my daughter. She was 3 at our wedding, and the flower girl. But her mother and I shouldn't have been together and couldn't work it out. We're divorced now, my daughter is nine and doing very well. Her mother and I continue to share custody and responsibility for her, and in the last year or so actually get along very well. It's nice.

If I could go back I would never have married her, but then I suppose most people who aren't happy in a marriage would say that, and the ones who are will disagree.
Hope that helps.

Answer 3

The ONLY reason for getting married is for the benefit of the children. It's not about being "acceptible." Children benefit from having the stability of married parents. Not having that commitment between the parents is difficult on children.

Answer 4

I didn't get married to have children. But I wouldn't have children outside of marriage. Has nothing to do with societal acceptance for me--my own personal limits dictate that it's marriage, sex, then possibly children. In that order. This is actually contrary to what some of my friends have done. What I've chosen to do has nothing to do with whether others will accept it or not.

Answer 5

the toddler has a father and as they have been dwelling mutually they have been straight forward regulation married on the time. purely the regulation won't realize this actuality. although, it extremely is optimal to be married before getting pregnant, even though it incredibly is not a prerequisite. Why does the daughter could omit her dad? that's the priority. He extra effective get some help and rapid to have get right of entry to to his toddler. it incredibly is the toddler who will omit out in any different case, if the mum is selfishly not allowing them to shop on seeing one yet another, She does not could be there and it incredibly is arranged in a relatives centre. do not make the toddler the "different 0.5" at her age, she needs to stay a toddler. it may well be sooooo incorrect to make the toddler help the mum in this separation.

Answer 6

It isn't a big deal to have children without being married and yet I got married anyways. So I guess my answer is yes... :)

Answer 7

A marriage certificate is not required to have children. But, children need to have the stability of mom and dad. Not to mention the difficulties of juggling raising kids, paying bills and going to work. It may not be necessary, but tough tasks require teamwork.

Answer 8

Yes. I like being married. I like the commitment, the solidarity, the togetherness, the belonging to each other.

Answer 9

I would be married because I think it is very important to have the father of the child be in his or her life daily. It would be as a family and this is what is important to me. Fathers are not just sperm donors.

Answer 10

I have been married for 7 years and we don't have kids, so yes.