There are two reasons why I am asking this question.
One, I am hoping for a good President in China. An American of Chinese ancestry returning home and being welcomed and accepted as President and Emperor (not the same concept as European or Western emperors). By Chinese custom this is very good and accepted. An emperor in Chinese custom is merely a man, who holds a mandate to rule from God. He is looked to as a god, but he is not a god or dictator as you have in the West. An Emperor in China is effective, especially if he is a good, smart, and knowledgeable men. Benevolent rule and having a rigid stand on issues, as long as they are good, for China, is not bad. In China's history, there were good rulers and bad ones. A good one, the best ever, hopes for a return so he can bring a new age to China, which includes a democratic type of government and Christianity. Is this so wrong. When you grow up in the West, you tend to believe in these things. China's new leader will bring
(contd)
2007-12-17 05:06:12 · 5 answers · asked by peacenegotiator 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
about change within the Chinese nation without violence and without civil war. He will work for what is good as Clinton did, but without Clinton's foibles.
Change in China is not possible without America's friendship and backing, so if a good leader arose in China....WILL AMERICA BE THERE TO HELP?
Will the newly elected President of the United States of America, help China change peacefully?
American people SHOULD pose this question to whomever the Democrat and Republican nominee is or to each and every candidate running to see what he or she says.
Bush refuses to do so. Giuliani swore at us and refused to listen to any word that we had to say. It was his position, we believe, that China is a sworn enemy and even if China turned to be a true Christian nation, Giuliani is sworn to be against us. And I don't know why. Hillary took a wait and see attitude, but she was not open and friendly. Obama distanced himself from us and from the true issues of the Iraq War (the truth as
(contd)
2007-12-17 05:16:39 · update #1
what really happened and was blind as to possible solutions to the Iraq War). Kucinich, also, didn't want to deal with truth at the time when we spoke to him. Edwards wanted to say that we were "nuts" and avoided us like the plague. In our eyes, he seemed insincere and only wanted to go with the polls instead of dealing with true issues of right versus wrong.
Bush Senior, in the summer of 1990, said that he would be willing to give serious consideration to our heritage and official succession. By doing so, we would then qualify for the needed Secret Service protection and protection under the laws of the United States of America and Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations. When we came out against the war, because we had just successfully negotiated the withdrawal of Saddam's troops from Kuwait. The Bush administration ignored us and our request for Secret Service protection and, subsequently, for the services of the US Attorney was tabled.
(contd)
2007-12-17 05:27:07 · update #2
WOULD A GOOD Democrat or Good Republican do any better? I wish that the American people would pose this question to see what each and every candidate said!
Two, I do know that a good solution DOES exist for settling and ending the Iraq War. If a good man, a truly good man or good woman, were to become the next President. We would see a righteous solution to the Iraq War!
Mrs. Clinton avoided our questioning and John Edwards treated us like dirt. Obama distanced himself and didn't want to answer our questions. He too treated us like dirt. So, I am here wondering about the honesty and integrity of America and the honesty and integrity of the next US President.
ANY GOOD ANSWERS out there from anyone?
End
2007-12-17 05:32:42 · update #3
=================================
PLEASE STAR THIS QUESTION!
=================================
2007-12-17 05:34:03 · update #4
Ps: Forgive grammar and spelling (typing) errors as I did not proof read this before posting. Sorry!
.
2007-12-17 05:36:22 · update #5
=================================
In order for goodness to occur in China, we need America's help!
=================================
2007-12-17 05:38:06 · update #6
Well, not if Republicans have it their way.
We'll see more of the same.....
Maybe this guy will be just a tiny bit more competent than GWB is though....but that's not saying much.
2007-12-17 05:37:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about a truly smart and good woman... Seems to me the men have made enough messes.. time for a woman to come on in and clean things up.
2007-12-17 13:09:49 · answer #2 · answered by myopinion 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
In order for a person to run for pres. they have to sell them selves out to the powers that control this country, both parties,
2007-12-17 13:48:00 · answer #3 · answered by Dave M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we will have a truely good woman as president in 2008.
2007-12-17 13:16:38 · answer #4 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't care about good. I want strong, competent and effective.
2007-12-17 13:19:22 · answer #5 · answered by wcowell2000 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋