English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sounds to me like a trick(y dicky) question.

2007-12-17 04:46:19 · 7 answers · asked by FRANsuFU 3 in Pets Other - Pets

7 answers

Hello,
Since I have a disabled son and no disabled critters yes we spend more on the kids then the critters.
Is this what you are talking about or the crazy people who think there pets are kids?

2007-12-17 20:35:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Use to my kids are adults now, they were always first and spent more more medications then the animals,When my eldest daughter ( Trace was born with a heart and lung con)was alive, and her brothers and sisters were all put first, now i spoil my 4 legged kids are.

2007-12-17 08:38:37 · answer #2 · answered by Kaye B 6 · 1 0

Equally the same cause my cat is like my sister..I love animals too much

2007-12-17 04:55:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, because insurance covers almost eveything for the kids.

2007-12-17 04:49:57 · answer #4 · answered by ARE YOUR NEWFS GELLIN'? 7 · 0 0

I would spend it on my children's health

2007-12-17 06:01:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well I don't have any children to tell you yes or no.

2007-12-17 04:58:43 · answer #6 · answered by Randomosity 3 · 1 0

Have no pets here.

2007-12-17 05:22:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers