English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Saddam in Controll of the Perfect route to a Nuclear armed Country.Scud missles hitting Isreal on a Daily Basis,The enemy of Saddams enemy Iran basicly off limits to the U.S. influance,Russia and china and North Korea laughing their ***'s off and the Liberal Democrats wearing Burka's.Yes America would have been hit so hard and so often that even events of today would have seemed like Childsplay.Thank God for George Bush!

2007-12-17 04:41:27 · 3 answers · asked by Clarance C 2 in Politics & Government Politics

The Point is those who are trying to kill Americans in Iraq would have made their way to Pakistan to kill Americans.Pakistan is Nuke Armed and very unstable and would have been 100 times worse without the fight in Iraq.

2007-12-17 04:51:05 · update #1

3 answers

Saddam had NO nuclear weapons. What part of that don't you get.

Saddam was not a threat to Pakistan , the U.S. or anybody. He had NO army, he had NO navy, he had NO air force.

the war in Iraq did NOT have to happen. Now there are over 4000 dead U.S. troops. There are over 6000 U.S. troops that have come home from Iraq and committed suicide. There are nearly a million dead Iraqi citizens. WHY??? It was not necessary.

2007-12-17 04:45:06 · answer #1 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 6 0

but of course, you casually ignore the FACT that we were hit very hard on 9/11.
those who hit us on that day WERE NOT IRAQI!
they were saudi arabians.

by the way, it's absolutely pathetic that you chose this method to advance your own morally bankrupt political agenda.

posters like this convince me all the more that republicans are simply NEVER TO BE TRUSTED WITH POWER AGAIN - EVER!

this bass-ackwards logic is what passes for reason these days.

hold our heads in the sand and hope against hope that the saudi arabian funded terrorists won't hit us again.

and until they do, declare victory in your war against reason and logic - waged against the american people.

our president is beyond weak - it's just preposterous to decide after the fact that iraq was a swell idea - and ignore the FACT that our president lied to us about their nuclear capacity and has just recently TRIED TO DO THE SAME THING AGAINST IRAN.

2007-12-17 12:48:34 · answer #2 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 4 0

um pakistan had nukes while saddam was in power

2007-12-17 12:46:27 · answer #3 · answered by tyler "god of typos" 5 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers