English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-17 04:19:31 · 4 answers · asked by brandon r 3 in Politics & Government Elections

Re Dan K. I don't think the media coverage of Ron Paul has anything to do with about 150,000 people donating yesterday.

2007-12-17 04:42:44 · update #1

4 answers

I doubt it. I've been wondering the same thing. I'd like to see some examples of people putting their cold hard cash on the table for any of those candidates...

2007-12-17 06:21:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes I do but since it only takes a few corporations or rich people to fund their campaigns, what would be the point. And 150,000 voters in a national election isn't many.

2007-12-17 12:32:55 · answer #2 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 3 0

By your way of thinking we should all ante up for Obama because HMS Oprah has the hots for him. You seem to be swayed by popular/media opinion too easily. To me, if the media broadcasts a politician's fund-raising activities, I tend to be a bit suspicious. They have a slanted agenda and must have an underlying objective somewhere.

2007-12-17 12:35:40 · answer #3 · answered by Dan K 5 · 3 0

Honestly, yes I do. It takes work to build that type of support base single handedly, but its doable with hard work.

2007-12-17 12:22:59 · answer #4 · answered by JW.C 6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers