English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And not for being women? Given that feminists are overwhelmingly homely and given that most responded in agreement to my question below and given that the responses also seem to reject equalizing the playing field based on beauty-discrimination, does it stand to reason that feminists simply oppose men because men have rejected them based on their looks?

2007-12-17 03:07:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

Angie V: There is also a strong correlation between lesbianism and ugliness (and also, perhaps, lumberjacks). Did you ever consider that maybe women become lesbians because they're ugly and have been treated poorly by men as a result?

2007-12-17 03:19:02 · update #1

kubebe: I don't doubt that there are some attractive women who are feminists (after all, attractive women tend to be a little dim since everything was handed to them and can easily be convinced of various things like feminism). What I do doubt is that beauty is the norm among feminists. In my experience they seem disproportionately ugly.

2007-12-17 03:24:08 · update #2

kubebe: Yes I did inform them, but since they broadcast under PBS (which is favorable towards feminism), my in depth analysis was rejected. It saddened me greatly that this obvious truth is sequestered by are double-speak obsessed society.

2007-12-17 03:28:21 · update #3

11 answers

What makes you think they're ugly? They might be ugly to you because they aren't willing to be submissive playmates but that doesn't mean they actually are ugly. Besides, being pretty doesn't necessarily provide opportunites for women. A pretty women won't go anywhere if she is not friendly or does not have a nice personality. Let's be realistic. Would you want to date a pretty woman who is a nasty person?

2007-12-17 14:29:21 · answer #1 · answered by RoVale 7 · 1 1

You seem to assume that all people who believe that women are human beings, not some lesser species (that is to say 'feminists') are all women.

That's simply untrue.

You also assume that all feminists are physically unattractive (more so than people in general), also not true.

You also completely miss the point that feminists are fighting for the equality of all humans.

You also assume that feminists oppose men, which is also not true.

So, you might start getting a hint of a clue as to what feminism IS, before making a bunch of insane and false statements.

The reason all women hate you is that you reject the idea that women are human beings. If you pretended to be human yourself, you'd probably find some women wouldn't hate you, then you'd be less bittter towards women.

2007-12-17 03:58:40 · answer #2 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 6 0

Raj, this is kinda childish as I have a number of close friends that consider themselves active feminist and they are pretty easy on the eyes.

EDIT: wow Raj, thanks so much for explaining the lesbian sexual structure to us all, have you informed NOVA yet?

EDIT: oh and I don't doubt that you left your mind very open while "experiencing" these feminist.
sorry your only retort to my observation was to bash women... you just sound like another bitter misogynist to me.

EDIT: I think you are confusing "obvious truth" with opinion, but that is only MY opinion.

2007-12-17 03:22:15 · answer #3 · answered by kub2 4 · 7 1

The ugly ones might have. Who knows?

Added: Stop self validating. It's pathetic.
Look, I'm sorry for laughing & pointing when you asked me out on a date. I couldn't help it.
It wasn't sexism, I was purely discriminating against your ugliness. So sue me.

2007-12-17 03:21:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

NO. Even beautiful women can be feminists, and the uglier ones became feminists for far deeper reasons.

2007-12-17 05:27:44 · answer #5 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 0 3

your personal opinion does not represent the vast majority.

also, i know many lesbians that are pretty damn hot.

oh AND i know many feminists that are far from ugly, but dude, you know that.

2007-12-17 03:26:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Raj, just when I thought you had finished scraping the bottom of the barrel of intellectual abilities, you get a shovel and start digging. Desperation, obsession and pathological jealousy are unbecoming on you.

2007-12-17 03:28:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

I don't think that is true at all. Didn't you say that they were all les anyway? If that is the case, why would they care?

No, I thought people were born that way and didn't become that way.

2007-12-17 03:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by Really? 6 · 4 2

Wow!
You need a life.

2007-12-17 03:33:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

I def. see where you are coming from and mostly agree. On television programs it is always the less attractive women who are so hateful to men and quick to call them sexest.
I would say the media protrays uglier women to be the ones more hateful to men.

2007-12-17 03:15:33 · answer #10 · answered by HmMm. 4 · 1 8

fedest.com, questions and answers