Just saw on espn where they projected the Falcons to draft Matt Ryan. With Derek Anderson establishing himself in Cleveland Quinn could be available. Browns need defensive help and Falcons need a qb it's a trade that could help both teams.
2007-12-17 02:15:21 · 18 answers · asked by enzfan82 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
No way. The Falcons should trade down, get mulitple first and second round picks (they already have 9 picks in next years draft) and draft a QB either late in the first round or in the second round. They need a lot of help besides QB and NO QB coming out in this years draft is worthy of a high first round pick. Matt Ryan........please!
2007-12-17 02:26:54 · answer #1 · answered by halfwaytoeverywhere 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are onto something, but the Browns will probably demand a first, second or third and fifth for Quinn, since a team would be getting a ready-made young QB who will be ready to start (the work Quinn has done on the sidelines and during the week in the classroom is invaluable when projecting him out to 2008-2009).
One - Anderson or Quinn - would mean a nice package of draft picks and the Browns must entertain offers. Though Quinn is perhaps as popular in northeast Ohio as former great Bernie Kosar, he will be stuck behind Anderson.
If the right deal comes along, the Browns should make the move.
2007-12-17 02:26:50 · answer #2 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why?? They can just hold him. I think Derek Anderson can be the franchise quarterback of the future, but anything can still happen. He could still revert to being a 3rd string bench warmer even as soon the playoffs should they make it. Maybe he goes down and gets a career injury that hinders his performance like Culpepper did a couple years ago. Cleveland has had so many problems and busts at quarterback in the last 20 years. Look at Tim Couch. Now that they have 2 potential great guys and if one fails, you've got the other as a backup plan. Besides, with Quinn getting drafted so late last year, he's not that pricey compared to what he would have been had he gone in the top ten as predicted. If they're going to trade him, let him sit for a couple years when you know for sure Anderson is "the guy" and Quinn's salary gets bigger year to year. As far as Anderson becoming a free agent, the Browns can resign him now while his price tag is still managable and be able to afford to keep both guys for a few years to determine who will be the better leader for that offense.
2007-12-17 02:22:44 · answer #3 · answered by Magnus 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. Cam Newton - A- I think he has more potential than anyone in the draft by a large margin.. "might" be a bust.. more likely to be a success as he's always been a success 2. Von Miller - A.. just a good solid pick 3. Marcel Dareus - B-.. he's a bust.. made his name off two good plays in 2009 and then basically stunk in 2010.. living off the hype and won't survive in Buffalo 4. AJ Green - B+.. he's OUTSTANDING and all that but my question is who's going to get him the ball? Could be an A pick if the Bengals replace Palmer 5. Patrick Peterson A--.. Barely an A but he is good.. the reason I give him the lower score is a lack of any QB on the roster in Arizona 6. Julio Jones: C-.. barely on the radar here.. Falcon's gave up too much and I got to question Julio in a couple of areas.. Falcon's are my team but a guy who's got suspect hands, speed and route running ability is NOT worth what the Falcon's gave up to get him 7. Aldon Smith: C.. like you said not what they need 8. Jake Locker: F.. bad pick in my opinion.. Titans could have gotten this guy in the 2nd round for less money 9. Tyron Smith.. I'd say A.. they need the line help.. but is this the best OL guy in the draft?.. I'd have taken Carimi personally 10. Blaine Gabbert: B+.. could have gone another direction but getting Gabbert here was a good spot 11. JJ Watt: B+.. good pick.. not a great one but a good one 12. Christian Ponder: F-.. tragicly bad choice.. this guy won't ever start a game in the NFL 13. Nick Fairley: A+.. sure Detroit could have gone with something on the OLine.. but c'mon Suh and Fairley next to each other on the same Line with Kile Vandenbosch? omfg that's sick 14. Robert Quinn: B.. ehh it's the Rams their picks never make sense 15. Mike Pouncey: B.. I think the Dolphins should be looking to the future at QB before the line but they might can get Mallett in round 2 16. Ryan Kerrigan: B.. great player but not sure that's the most pressing need for the team 17. Nate Solder: A-.. not my first OT to take but a good pick for the Patriots 18. Corey Liuget: A-.. might not be the most pressing need but a good choice here for the Chargers 19. Prince Amukamara: A+ in my opinion the best choice of any draft pick in the first round 20. Adrian Clayborn: A-.. good player good pick.. but may not be the best pick they could have made 21. Phil Taylor: not sure 22. Anthony Castonzo: well again I like Carimi better and he was still available 23. Danny Watkins: B.. good player decent need 24. James Carpenter: D.. not a good pick.. not at all 25. Cameron Jordan: A Saints need defense to go with that offense 26. Jonathan Baldwin A-.. I think the Chiefs need a bit of everything might as well go all Detroit or Cincy and start with receivers 27. Jimmy Smith Again Not sure.. 28. Mark Ingram: A-.. I'm not sure why they need him but he's a good player 29. Gabe Carimi A++.. c'mon the best OLine guy in the country is a STEAL at #29 30: Muhammad Wilkerson A.. good pick overall 31: Cameron Heyward: B- but does keep the Ironhead Legacy alive 32: Derek Sherrod: A+ finally Mississippi State gets draft love! and the Packers need OLine badly BQ: I think my team is done in the draft (Falcons) but my second team (Titans) need Defensive Line, Secondary and a REAL QB next time.. I mean really you run off Jeff Fisher and Vince Young to get Jake Locker?.. WHAT?!
2016-04-09 21:37:58 · answer #4 · answered by Jane 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no, 1) the falcons wouldnt trade a possible #2 pick for brady quinn and 2) the browns wouldnt trade him regardless, derek anderson was a big suprise to them and probally expected to start quinn a few weeks after anderson started. to bad anderson is doing awesome this year
2007-12-17 02:32:42 · answer #5 · answered by Conan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cleveland spent too much to get Quinn to give up on him after one year, plus there is no gauruntee that Anderson even comes back to the Browns, free agency is tricky...he may get a huge offer from Miami and have to jump on it!
They have said all along that no matter how great Anderson is playing he is in the DeBerg role (keep the seat warm until the future takes over).
2007-12-17 02:35:15 · answer #6 · answered by bdough15 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nice logic, apart from the fact that Derek Anderson is scheduled to become a free agent, and something tells me that even if the Browns re-sign him, they will eventually get their big money investment on the field at some point.
After all, why go through great pains to move up in the draft to select him only to trade him before he's been truly tested?
2007-12-17 02:24:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a ND fan, and love Brady Quinn, but I think Matt Ryan will be a better pro. He plays more like a pro QB. I would take Ryan if I had the pick.
2007-12-17 02:21:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Derek Anderson will be a FA so the Browns will keep Quinn.
2007-12-17 02:31:36 · answer #9 · answered by 2gadoo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think the Browns are trading Quinn?
Because, this just in, they are not. They have him under a low contract and will extend Anderson's contract as well. It's a win-win for the Browns.
2007-12-17 02:20:39 · answer #10 · answered by Why So Serious? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋