"Theory" is a scientific word. A theory is a scientific hypothesis that can be tested. Wikipedia calls a theory a testable model.
A scientific "law" is something that can be objectively proven through testing, and will accurately predict something every time.
Example: relativity (E=mc2) is a theory because it can be tested, but has not yet been proven. Newton's law of universal gravitation on the other hand is something that is proven, and in a sense, absolute.
So, if journalistic theories are based on testable, quantitative evidence and analysis that can be subject to "peer review" and scrutiny, then why not.
If they are mere conjecture and cannot be tested, then they do not belong.
2007-12-16 19:30:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Theory very rarely has any place anywhere outside of a learning environment. That being said, theory helps create a thinking framework to help deliver more intelligent thought. In other words, it makes you smarter. The real world runs on money, hence Britney Spears makes for widely read journalism. Aristotle's ideas on communication have nothing to do with Britney Spears making headlines (well, they actually do if you read about what makes good drama.... but you get the idea), but theory allows someone to say, I know what is going to work because I have thought things through. Theory is the brainpower, and money is currency. That's my argument. It's harsh, but I believe it's true.
2007-12-16 19:27:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by CharlieC 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
in view which you're an Australian matriculation pupil, i'm purely suprise you %. the PHILIPPINES on your undergraduate examine against different international locations like Thailand or perhaps Singapore. I have been given your element while you evaluate this is low priced. think of that, training is so low priced like purchase one take one unfastened. did no longer happen additionally to you the educational can is likewise accessible in low priced? I propose like ordinary come, ordinary is going device of training? properly in view that i'm a Filipino our training device is declining in the process the years. the well-known isn't there anymore yet as a foreigner you're able to desire to locate a distinctive attitude right here. in view which you won't be able to %. a school on your examine, then why settle on on interpreting interior the Philippines brushing aside the main inexpensive cost of training a threat. you haven't any longer have been given any friends or perhaps close kin living interior the Philippines that can assist you you some how on your request? such as you reported Manila is visited in many circumstances via hurricane with the aid of fact Philippines have purely 2 season-moist and dry season. yet once you're interior the midst of the moist season prepare your self of blackout with the aid of fact maximum electrical energy are short-term disconnected, the streets are flooded as you state it right here. you want a boat again in the process a few places in Manila. And the crime value at the instant are not possibly that good yet no longer undesirable the two. so which you're able to watch your lower back multiple the time. l. a. Salle isn't low priced to tell you relating to the fees there. And UP they choose for people who've skill like intense marks and overall performance interior the previous colleges. truthfully there are a number of college interior the Philippines purely for this course--journalism/mass comm. Lyceum of the Philippines is between the pioneer in this field of mass communciation it is likewise placed in Manila. this is extra much cheap than l. a. Salle. What you want is to prepare and take front examination from each and every of the colleges you have in ideas, and if the place you bypass the examination then take the course there. you do no longer could choose for between one college to a distinctive. it fairly is no longer the college which will graduate right here this is YOU splendid? so which you're able to hold the torch of the call of the college no longer any incorrect way around. The company is right here continuously yet you i assume you're purely passing by.
2016-11-03 13:24:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No...
They have a place...(I have a Journalism & English B.A.)...
The "inverted pyramid" style of Journalism can be very limiting depending on the kind of story you're covering...
"Literary Journalism" like "The Right Stuff," enables the reporter to "interpret" and include his own views about situations he is reporting on...the "theory" that a reporter should remain absolutely "impartial" is ridiculous given the fact that "total human impartiality" is impossible...
So..."theories" can be incorporated into stories if their presence has a "value" to the main body of the story, and are "relevant" to the "message" of the story being covered...
2007-12-16 19:25:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes and no.
Basically, theory is for training kids. They sum up experience in the pass and formalized into so called best practice, i.e. no one can achieve.
You are an individual being and got your own essence. Hence, you should codify all your founding in your own notion. Then, you can have innovation.
However, the consistency would be a problem. In order to maintain the consistency, you need to be grounded to the pass, i.e. theory. Then, your innovation would be an extention of the existing theory if you can prove them.
2007-12-16 22:38:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by giginotgigi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe this question is less about stating the facts as stating your opinions. You may need to back up your opinions with examples, facts and the opinions of prominent people who agree with your ideas. As the question potentially discredits theorists (a theorist's bias would be to say theory is practical), you probably should not quote one, unless their arguement is very compelling. Instead try to track down an experienced journalist. Hopefully one will answer this question for you on Y!Answers.
2007-12-16 19:27:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Timbo 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I was thinking about saying yes, but really everything started as theory, and by theory do we find fact. So if we ban theory from journalism and mass media, we limit our chances of finding fact.
2007-12-16 19:23:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋