2007-12-16 18:35:19 · 10 answers · asked by NYC 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absolutely not and I think the reasons are quite obvious.
2007-12-16 18:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by Matt V 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The United States and Canada might make sense as they are very much alike.
Here is one group that supports it.
http://www.unitednorthamerica.org/index.htm
As for Mexico there is a huge difference in terms of language, culture, and GDP per capita.
It would be hard to overcome those differences.
2007-12-16 18:43:26 · answer #2 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
NO, it's a threat to our national sovereignty. It undermines the Constitution & the Bill of Rights. The government is slowly working to eliminate the middle class. Before long we'll be just like Mexico. Furthermore it explaines why the government is dragging their heels on the illegal immigration promlem. Soon there won't be as many illegals. It scare's the hell out of me. They want to call it the American Union.
2007-12-16 19:40:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
once you're asking the place the geographic midsection may well be, it fairly is Rugby, North Dakota. the financial and political facilities of a trans-continental union may well be no longer liable to alter from those of on the instant for many motives (notice that Bonn, Germany nonetheless has a political atmosphere twenty years after reunification). it fairly is, of course, all below the very unbelievable assumption that the variety of union may well be formed as something critically extra beneficial than what NAFTA already is.
2016-11-03 13:22:08 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can imagine the northern U.S. states combining with Canada, since most of their people have a similarly decent level of education. But there's no way the entire U.S. can unite with Canada, because all the southern yahoos would just screw it up. And nobody wants Mexico, as the only commodity they have ever produced is immigrants.
2007-12-16 19:18:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I woud support only western Canada And even than they would have to go too re-ed classes
2007-12-16 18:50:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
So you are saying you want to convert the whole continent into one country. Bad idea. Just what would we call it?
2007-12-16 19:06:43 · answer #7 · answered by Jacks036 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yo quero Taco Bell, eh?
2007-12-16 19:42:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
No!!!
2007-12-16 19:07:57 · answer #9 · answered by Mir 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO!
2007-12-16 18:49:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋