English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

i am 60 years old and have never paid the useage tax on private money, know to most of you as the income tax, title 26 the internal revenue code.

the 16th amendment DID NOT give the federal government the lawful right to tax a person living in one of the 50 union states on a direct bases.

The Supreme Court stated in Brushaber vs Union Pacific RR, 240 US 1, Jan 1916.

Regarding the "Income Tax Act" that we first dispose of two propositions assailing the validity of the statue. On one hand because of the contradiction the 16th amendent has on the constitution in other words the constitution can not be at war with itself, since one of the two taxing clause of the constitution does not allow direct tax on income of US Citizen without apportionment and second "especially "because the 16th amendment did not authorize a direct tax on the income of US Citizens living and working in the 50 union states!

The court ruled the 16th amendment did not grant any new taxing power to congress. all the 16th amendment did is clarify that the income tax referred to in the language of the amendment was an indirect excise tax, NOT a direct tax on the incomes of US Citizens as we have been lead to believe all these years.

The supreme court ruled in Stanton vs Baltic mining, 240 U.S. 103, one month after the Brushaber case. that Brushaber settled that the provision of the 16th amendment conferred no new power of taxation but simply prohibited the..power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the catagory of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged.

Title 26 The Internal Revenue Code states is Section 7806 (b) no legistative construction have been made of title 26 the internal revenue code, it is not public law folks!

Court case Neel vs U.S., D.C. Ga 1996 266 F. supp.7. The said Congress has not given them the force of law. Section
7805 Note 15, of title 26 Internal Revenge Code!

Now if you look at the Internal Revenue Code Title 26, Section31.3402(p)-1 it talks about Voluntary withholding agreements. you fill out a W-4 form it constitutes a request for withholding of income tax! "VOLUNTARY"

Now for you nay sayors, Section 31.3402(p)-1(b)(2) states:

An agreement under section3402(p) shall be effective for such period as the employer and the employee mutually agree upon. However, either the employer or the employee may"TERMINATE" the agreement prior to the end of such period by furishing a signed written" NOTICE "to the other.

If your are currently in the system, you are bound by contract law, this how the IRS comes after you. Tax court is not a court but adminstrative hearing over heard not by a judge but a IRS employee.

one needs to educated oneself how to legally and lawfully exit the federal tax system threw the process of a "RELIANCE STATEMENT".

in closing your government can run this country without taking your income. they are now, what you pay in a income tax goes to the Federal Reserve System a private corporation which does not pay a income tax! The grace report in 1980's
commissioned by the government stated not one penny of income tax goes to any program run by the federal government, it goes to the private corporation called the Federal Reserve System, which owns a Corporation called The Department of Treasury, which is not the Treasury of the United States, its collection agency the Internal Revenue Service is a private corporation. Both the Dept of Treasury and IRS are incorporated in the state of Rhode Island!

The only reason that Title 26 the Internal Revenue Code is not Unconstitutional, because you volunteer to became a federal tax payor! The W-4 form is a contract!

God Bless America

JR.

2007-12-16 17:14:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Only the braindead think income tax is illegal and btw, the 16th Amendment was properly ratified . The Secretary of the Treasury was created by an act of Congress in 1789 by an Act of Congress. The IRS was named the Internal Revenue service in 1953. It used to be called the Bureau of Internal revenue. I know you want to think income taxes are illegal but that is just another fantasy. I have plenty of documentation to prove otherwise.
If you do not want to pay your income taxes feel free not to. Then suffer the consequences.

2007-12-16 15:25:50 · answer #2 · answered by Paul K 3 · 3 1

The U.S. Constitution, 16th Amendment addresses income taxes. Where do you get the idea they are illegal?

2007-12-16 15:19:41 · answer #3 · answered by commonsense 5 · 4 1

Income tax is not illegal, the argument is who it applies to. Income tax was started on a voluntary bases. in the beginning it is written that it only applied to government workers and aliens working in the united states. Well the government workers got real pissed and said it should not apply to them since they had to do all the work. So there you go the government does not have to pay, they just make you believe that what was once voluntary is now mandatory. Some idiots out there THINK that income tax goes to the government but they really have no idea where it goes. Ronald Reagan had the balls to investigate this very idea and found that not one penny of your tax dollar goes to pay for one thing in our government. it is deposited in the world banking system. Go check it out for yourself, the info is out there all you have to do is look for it. The IRS that collects income tax is not a part of our government, they do not give this money back to the united states. The name is deceiving making you believe that it is internal revenue for the united states. So I would tell you to decide for yourself if you would like to pay your FAIR share to support...........hummmmm...........somebody.

2007-12-16 15:27:53 · answer #4 · answered by thepopeyebob 3 · 0 5

Since light is dark, how can we see in the daytime?

Income tax isn't illegal, so your question is nonsense.

Richard

2007-12-16 15:09:36 · answer #5 · answered by rickinnocal 7 · 4 1

Your question is based on a false premise. The income tax is legal, and failure to pay, or failure to file, is a criminal offense.

2007-12-16 15:08:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Let's disect your question.

Since income tax IS NOT ILLEGAL, your question has no basis.

Next question.

2007-12-16 15:17:07 · answer #7 · answered by BC 6 · 4 1

You're premise is flawed. It is not illegal regardless of how many snake-oil salesmen you've been listening to.

2007-12-16 15:09:29 · answer #8 · answered by Chris G 4 · 4 1

How about you don't file, and get back to us on how that worked for you.

Make sure you get back before they lock you up, there is no internet in prison.

2007-12-16 15:20:05 · answer #9 · answered by trooper3316 7 · 3 2

Legal or not, I will pay it, I get more back than I pay in anyways...

2007-12-16 15:14:42 · answer #10 · answered by sweetseekinlife 1 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers