McCain, Giuliani, Thompson, and maybe Huckabee are better
Paul, Hunter, Tancredo, Romney are worse
2007-12-16 13:47:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by John 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
None are worse.
Rudy, Romney, and Ron Paul are better than Bush in my opinion.
Huckabee might possibly be worse though for different reasons, John McCain is the same as Bush, Fred Thompson not much different.
2007-12-16 21:06:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by spartan-117 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
The only republican which would be better than Bush, and this is just my opinion, would be Ron Paul.
He's got my vote in the primary!
2007-12-16 22:22:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Danny 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul would be better, a true conservative, and he would end the war.
Most of the other so called "Republicans" and the Democrats too would be little difference then Bush
2007-12-16 21:12:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Most or all of them are better from what I can tell, and this is every reason to vote Republican.
That liberal above who says they're worse is a liar.
2007-12-16 21:49:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think Paul, Romney, Giuliani, and McCain are all better than Bush. The others would be equal or worse.
But I'm a (D) so wouldn't vote for any (R).
2007-12-16 21:10:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by topink 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
That remains to be seen, but I don't believe in my heart of hearts that any of them could be worse than Bush.
2007-12-16 21:18:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lettie D 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul is possibly the better one, and all rest are worse.
2007-12-17 09:39:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by T E 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
All of them are better, except maybe Fred Thomson just because I get the feeling that he really doesn't wanna be running and will drop out after the first cycle is over.
2007-12-16 21:06:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
i don't know about worse , id say they are the same as bush so are the Democrats running
Ron Paul is the only one who stands out from the crowd
2007-12-16 21:04:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋