English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If not, who would be better?

2007-12-16 10:44:43 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Hmm.

Well you've got a religious nut, a small government conservative, a big government conservative, a flip-flopper, a film "star", a loony who shouldn't be allowed on tv and a couple of no-hopers.

I think you have all the bases covered.

2007-12-16 10:49:10 · answer #1 · answered by rosbif 7 · 5 2

Love your trick questions. NO, of course not. It's a wide open horse race. Both sides. Yearlings and aged ponies. But I love a good race. Still say Chi watch for the long shot McCain. If he was at Santa Anita the pay day would be huge. In honor of the beloved Barbaro , my pick is the dark horse.

Better? John Kennedy Jr alive and running. He & Barbaro had too much life left. SO does McCain. The rest are circus clowns.
In my opinion of course. Mahalo.

edit: R us still hawking Ron Paul? Dude he is a shill and will throw the ticket. NO prob for you as a dimocrat but I care and he is ?? NO IRS and the other ideas? HOW? He just says make it so like Jean Luv Picard Capt of the USS Enterprise?
Whell beam me up Scotty he can not make it real? OR tell me how? Show me a link ?? xx

2007-12-16 11:04:35 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0 1

LOL, it quite is humorous! No, i'm afraid (no longer probably, it quite is purely a discern of speech lol) that Steele and GOP, is sealing their very own DOOM lol. maximum Repubs never needed Michael Steele. He develop into USED as a puppet by election of a 0.5 Black Barack Obama. Repubs have referred to as him the "hip hop kneegrow" and different nasty names. Please, the excellent concern is a widespread fat humorous tale. And Steele is an entire and utter dummy, whom I haven't any pity for. He knew what he develop into entering into, and who he develop into coping with. and that i think of it quite is disgusting how he berates a President with lies, who's an identical brown shade as he's, just to soothe the GOP by potential of any potential needed. A GOP who particularly would not provide 2 cents worth of preserve him (Steele)! stupid. Did you spot that they've been attempting to get rid of him? Yeah, an identical GOP, the social gathering that he's so honest to lol. The scapegoat Steele purely did what they needed him to do, and now they choose to get rid of him by fact their deliberate sh*yt has hit the fan and it quite is blowing proper decrease back directly to them lol. In different words, their schemes did no longer artwork, and various people are not chuffed related to the BS that they are obtainable doing. people could attain that they are being watched, and their strikes are on the information each and every night.

2016-11-27 22:18:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No they do not!! But why in the world would a good,smart republican want to have his life ruined by running for president and possible winning. All people do is disrespect anyone in office and personally i think it adds many years to their lives and is very hards on their families. i do not blame the Good Republicans.They do not need the Power .

2007-12-16 11:22:20 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 0 1

Huckabee represents the fundamentalists; McCain represents the centrists; Guliani the representation of celebrity; Romney represents a little of both.

2007-12-16 10:54:44 · answer #5 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 1 2

No most of them are not mainstream conservatives. They are big-government, big-spending, globalist neocons who used to be the fringe group behind the scenes that have now wormed their way into the incompetent White House and Congress.

2007-12-16 10:51:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

i think rudy romney huckabee advocate and spend like what the democrats of two to three decades ago. they are not true conservatives this is why the republican base is shrinking.
tancredo, paul, thompson are the only people that have a true conservative message, the old school republican party. not the new neoconservative mess.

2007-12-16 10:58:26 · answer #7 · answered by Boston George 3 · 1 2

Considering the addition of Alan Keyes... Yes.

2007-12-16 11:13:50 · answer #8 · answered by Neal 4 · 1 1

No, I don't know who might be better but I do know that anyone who runs on any ticket for this office needs to be prepared to be attacked. It simply is not worth it.

2007-12-16 10:48:06 · answer #9 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1 1

Yes. 40% liberals 40% conservative and 10% wacko.

2007-12-16 10:49:39 · answer #10 · answered by Locutus1of1 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers