English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have always postulated of a symmetrical opposite universe, the crunch phase transition "event horizon" of the an extreme mass black hole, (galaxy's you see spiralling in like a drain) and the massless one, (where it spews out the other side), and one in the same. The "big bang" single beginning seems even more ridiculous, now that they have found an area of space with absolute nothingness, and its as big as all of the area they have charted "with stars planets" etc...! so nothing IS something, its the symmetrical opposite of somethings.

2007-12-16 08:06:28 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

ahh.... so John S at least considers the symmetrical opposite theoretical possibility...at least in concept, it kind of fits in my brain, which I admit is somewhat of a dryed out rabbit sh!ts- turd floating around a vacume, sometimes colliding with the worn perferated pvc tube that connects one ear to the other (why a light can shine through) but because of the worn holes in this tube the colliding turd forces out a sensible reasoning. THx 2 you all and variety of original thought provoking replies, to this circular question that most brainiacs just scoff at, which rersolves nothing, and stops a stiff necked one from learning by open considerations. ie: I know its not often I will learn from a child, but I believe it has happened and will again..as a respect for their fresh perspective viewpoint, that could uncover an angle, I might have missed...and so once again this forume here proves a great value, rarely seen in the kissbutt smooserie of human domain interactions, of daily life.

2007-12-16 16:32:07 · update #1

ahh.... so John S at least considers the symmetrical opposite theoretical possibility...at least in concept, it kind of fits in my brain, which I admit is somewhat of a dryed out rabbit sh!ts- turd floating around a vacume, sometimes colliding with the worn perferated pvc tube that connects one ear to the other (why a light can shine through) but because of the worn holes in this tube the colliding turd forces out a sensible reasoning. THx 2 you all and variety of original thought provoking replies, to this circular question that most brainiacs just scoff at, which resolves nothing, and stops a "stiff necked" one from "learning" by through open considerations. ie: I know its not often I will learn from a child, but I believe it has happened and will again..as a respect for their fresh perspective viewpoint, that could uncover an angle, I might have missed. and so once again this forum proves great value, rarely seen in the kissbutt smooserie of human domain interactions, of daily life

2007-12-16 16:35:58 · update #2

5 answers

You, like many scientists, can't accept an acausal Universe. So you invent things which may have caused it. But those things, whatever they are, are part of the Universe. You can't escape a beginning with no cause. I know. It's perplexing. But why should we presume to be able to comprehend the Universe in its totality?

So when you pick up on the idea that nothing is nothing, not something empty, then you will be there. It will be disturbing, but probably true.

2007-12-16 08:14:22 · answer #1 · answered by Brant 7 · 0 0

Because it is the center of every thing. It's not like a donut hole, empty. On a +/- number line 0 is the center, if you have a hole in the middle it doesn't work. The 0 is just a place holder showing that beyond this point things change axes or +/-. It is not a zero as in nothing there.
I believe that the number line is the best way to describe the universe. For everything on the plus side there should be something on the negative side, either exact opposite or of equal mass.

2007-12-16 14:18:38 · answer #2 · answered by John S 5 · 1 0

No, the graph in no way crosses the y-axis. each time a graph crosses the y-axis, its y-coordinate is 0. yet while xy = a million, then y can't be 0, as a results of fact something cases 0 is 0 (not a million). So the graph of xy = a million in no way crosses the y-axis.

2016-10-11 10:13:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hi. The x, y, z '3D graph' is so much easier to understand than the x, y, z, T '4D graph'. In a 4D graphics world a human would look something like a winding tube, starting at conception as a very small part of the tube, and ending up as ashes, usually in a box. That THAT is more interesting. (I did not make up this concept but can not remember the author's name.)

2007-12-16 09:33:02 · answer #4 · answered by Cirric 7 · 0 0

To answer your first question, it is a theoretical point. There is no actual space involved. Geometry is an abstract mental construction.

In your big drain theory, what determines if the whole universe spins clockwise or counter clockwise?

2007-12-16 08:13:26 · answer #5 · answered by unmonitored e 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers