Easily McNabb. Michael Vick has never had a qb rating over
81.6
2007-12-20 06:18:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
both of em went to the dogs quick, but sorry if you are looking for an answer im going to go with Vick. Granted he never had a Super Bowl (and never will) but at least he was more consistent. McNabb is turning into Wrecks Grossman. The only thing he can McNabb is defeat from the jaws of victory.
2007-12-16 07:34:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by James R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vick has never been worth a damn and McNabb has never been better than decent, he has a couple of good seasons b/c of TO and Andy Reid's "throw it up 70 times a game" system. They both suck. But McNabb was/is better. At least he can kind of throw the ball...
2007-12-16 07:37:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by wcbaseball4 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
McNabb, Vick was a poor QB.
2007-12-16 08:10:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
McNabb.
But honestly, neither was that good in their prime. McNabb was never great under pressure, and Vick was an amazing scrambler but a horrible passer.
2007-12-16 07:33:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mcnabb was, he at least had his team in a position to win a superbowl, though i do wonder how vick's carreer would have been if jamal anderson had still been around.....and the falcons should have never got rid of dan reeves. dan knew how to get the best of a running qb.
2007-12-16 07:35:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by 22steve5150 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
McNabb
2007-12-16 07:32:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by -Jason HAM- Long Vive Le Jambon 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
McNabb. Mainly cause he was able to get the Eagles to a Super Bowl.
2007-12-16 07:50:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jazzy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
McNabb was a true quarterback,and second to none in his prime.Vick was a good athlete but mediocre as a quarterback,most of his great plays were done scrambling for yards,not passing
2007-12-16 07:36:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
McNabb, because he was unstoppable for a 4 year period of time, he got his team to 4 straight NFC Championships,
its just not injuries have taken their tole.
2007-12-16 07:37:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by K.O. Fa sho 6
·
0⤊
0⤋