how fast would they force the U.S. to surrender to terrorists in Iraq (i.e., cut and run) ?
2007-12-16 05:48:53 · 13 answers · asked by a bush family member 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
pretty quickly. or they would grant citizenship to all terrorists.
i really would like to see all democrats move to north korea and see how they like it there. stop complaining and leave. i'll pay for the ticket.
2007-12-16 05:52:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
I don't think the Iraq policy would change one bit. Liberals are famous for saying one thing and then doing quite another once in office.
The only thing that would change is how the liberal press would be reporting on it. Instead of downplaying the successes and pushing the negatives they'd be more truthful.
They'd also keep telling us to be patient and reminding us on how Bush created this mess and Hillary or whoever takes over is only trying to repair the damage that the Bush administration caused.
2007-12-16 06:03:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The endorsement is Carter's backhanded way of getting Obama reelected. Everyone knows that US working class conservatives despise Carter -- including Carter knows.
2016-05-24 05:29:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know how science says nothing moves faster than the speed of light? Well if a dem is elected, they'd prove that wrong, cause they'd move faster to pull our troops out and ensure the snatching of defeat from the jaws of victory.
2007-12-16 05:55:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The only truly liberal Democrat running is Kucinich, so that's not likely to happen. You'll get a Democon instead like Hillary, Edwards, or Obama who keep things the way they are--much like they're doing in Congress.
2007-12-16 05:54:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Right before the votes are counted. You see, those who would elect such a "person" would have already agreed that terrorists have the right to KILL, and NOT stand up to JUSTICE, like some of them are now. The name of the future president who would allow freedom for terrorists, but deny freedom-loving Americans the right to defend themselves, and their country, is Hillary Clinton.
Want to bet me? I bet the safety, and livlihood of myself, my young child, the rest of America, and the world. What has anyone else got to put up against that?
2007-12-16 06:08:44 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
The forerunners would probably sell the nation out during their inaugural speech.
2007-12-16 06:43:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
So you LIKE the Dictator Dumbya Big Lie Iraqi Crusade?
2007-12-16 05:55:44 · answer #8 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yet another self-serving question that allows fascists to pat themselves on their own backs......
2007-12-16 17:26:21 · answer #9 · answered by Sim - plicimus 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A.S.A.P
Or immediately after being sworn into office.
2007-12-17 03:58:44 · answer #10 · answered by Adelaide B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋