Fred Thompson is the most boring. Rudy is a crook and a big time one! McCain is old, but still deserves our respect. Romney reminds me of a statue. Huckabee turned out to be a lot smarter than most Americans thought he was. Hillary has a lot of guts because there is much hatred for her out there, but it doesn't seem to stop her. Alan Keyes just likes to give oratorical declarations. Obama is young, intelligent and has a vision. Kucinich is a nice pacifist, but too far left for America at this point in time. Gravel's mouth runs too fast for his brain which hurts him. He has a hard time making people understand just what he is talking about. I know he can't help it, but would you want him talking to World Leaders on behalf of the US. John Edwards seems to be a nice guy with his heart in the right place, but it doesn't look like he's gonna' get the nomination. I was just thinking, I've really never heard anyone say anything derrogatory about him. Except the thing with his hair and he couldn't have his done anymore than Romney does and besides that's not a bad thing.
2007-12-16 07:25:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Frankenberry put me to sleep when he was on TV.
Romney, with his personal "revision of history" is also very boring.
McCain is getting old, and I do not want to see another William Harrison in office die within the first year of office.
Rudy seems pretty slick, and is just as ugly in drag as Rosanne Barr.
Ron Paul is pretty hyper, but has some interesting things to say. However, I will not be a part of his cult following.
Hillary has her good and bad days; she can roll with the punches with the best of them. However, sometimes she loses her lady-like composure, and comes off as being catty.
Obama is young, intelligent and articulate. However, he still has a lot to learn about politicking, and not burning bridges.
Edwards' speech about the wealthy owning the country, and it is time for the people to take it back is such rubbish, as he is one of the wealthy (I won't even go there, concerning the price of his haircut; maybe I will). He seems too insincere.
As for the rest, they will probably thin out soon; including Huckabee, who's preaching may bode well in Iowa, but will not carry the big states like California and New York.
Just one person's analysis...
2007-12-16 05:54:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fred Thompson is for sure the most boring. He always looks and acts like he needs to lay down and take a nap. Obama definatly isn't boring though.
2007-12-16 05:46:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by J 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
McCain for sure! Fred Thompson has his moments at least!
2007-12-16 05:42:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by oogabooga37 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
This year it would be Chris Dodd.
The candidate that holds the record would be John Kerry.
2007-12-16 05:45:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hillary by far. It's always the same old lines how everything that's ever happened is the Republicans or Bushs fault. She gives them FAR too much credit.
2007-12-16 05:45:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by infidel-louie 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
i might plenty quite have HIM than Obama, by fact Obama is --properly, enable's no longer pass there. i might say lots of McCain's speeches can placed absolutely everyone to sleep, yet I want him over somebody who purely needs money and thinks that abortion is high-quality.
2016-11-27 21:18:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by molder 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hands down, Chris Dodd.
2007-12-16 05:57:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by RTO Trainer 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well I'm not sure which is the most boring. But I would rather be bored than too much excitement. Too much excitement can get you into trouble.
2007-12-16 05:54:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've been around so long and listened to the same unending litany of drivel so often over the years that today it all just sounds the same. Like they say, "Different day...same bull sh*t."
2007-12-16 05:42:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋