Face it. Obama has not done enough to determine whether you can trust him or not. He has too little experience. Plus he has taken cocaine and marijuana.
2007-12-16 02:33:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I agree. I think they do want Obama to win secretly. But they are trying to pretend they want Hillary to win. But it's a huge lie. It's their strategy to get no one to vote for Hillary via the "oh no..the republicans want Hillary to win - we better not give into them" They really do not want to go up against the same team of people who helped her husband beat the Republicans. It's not even the Hillary factor - they just have very good strategists and tactical people that the Republicans would not dare to face.
I would get off the cocaine and marijuana thing. I think Bush did too and it didn't seem to effect him. As long as it was a while ago I don't know if its going to have a strong effect. To be honest I think in a country where fear is wide-spread his colour and religious background (even if he is not Muslim now) will be the determinants. I prefer Hillary, but it is unfortunate that race and religion will play in this for Obama.
2007-12-16 03:01:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of Obama would be extra stable to conquer than Hillary. some issues to contemplate: a million) the finished united states of america has enormously plenty made up their suggestions approximately Hillary, and 40 5 % of the inhabitants has an destructive view of her. Its much less complicated to make an outstanding first impact than it is to alter the minds of tens of millions of individuals who already have their suggestions made up. 2) Hillary brings particularly some luggage. the two from the Clinton years and purely usually. 3) Hillary is an somewhat polarizing determine. She's "love her" or "hate her." for this reason, the rustic will stay sharply divided even assuming she became into able to win. 4) Hillary's perspectives are far exterior of the mainstream. She's very liberal, and maximum electorate discover her this style. (visit the hyperlink under to verify). 5) Hillary has a actual challenge with the anti-warfare base of the Democratic social gathering. She keeps changing her place on the Iraq warfare, and the anti-warfare base needs somebody who would be consistent in opposing the warfare. Obama would possibly no longer seem to be as electable correct now, yet i think of he may be the main electable interior the tip. i'm a conservative and that i'd be worried at an Obama nomination. stick to-Up: Matthew, how did I show your element? I asserted the excellent opposite of what you're arguing.
2016-11-03 11:07:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Either one will be easy to win, neither are qualified. Obama does not have experience and whether you like the war or not we cannot leave Iraq without causing serious economic pain. And I mean OIL. We are dependent on oil and cannot leave that region until we are secure and not dependent on it. Nothing will cripple this country and put us to our knees quicker than loosing oil supplies. So pulling troops out right away is not an option. Hillary would leave the troops in and pressure the Iraq govt to work faster and take credit for what is happening now. But she really is unelectable. For one thing she flip flops more then Bill. You can't get a straight answer on how she is going to accomplish anything. To many voters want to know how this is to be accomplished. She will get the standard Bush hater votes but Bush isn't running.
2007-12-16 02:55:31 · answer #3 · answered by dwjohn15765 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I disagree. I think Obama has a better chance than Hillary. Hillary is too polarizing! This life-long Democrat woman doesn't like her. I would love to see a woman POTUS in my lifetime, but not her. People don't get it. She only entered politics to run for this office. She has done a pretty good job as a junior senator but taking years of public service into account, Obama has nearly 10 years as an elected official and Hillary has less.
And are you trying to tell me that Hillary Rodham never did any drugs when she was in college? Yeah, right!
2007-12-16 02:50:29 · answer #4 · answered by lesroys 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would not say that at all. I would rather see Hillary Clinton as the nominee because of her baggage were I a republican campaign strategist. Sen Obama is a little too inexperienced as of today but in four or eight years he will still be fairly young. His future seems pretty bright politically and he seems to be very likable to many people on either side.
2007-12-16 02:38:44 · answer #5 · answered by Chuck J 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think the presidents former drug use is of any relevance, if so...then, President Bush was an alcoholic, and look at the current state of your country now.
Maybe Barack Obama(sp?) is best for the job, I mean experience is a great thing, but it doesn't mean you'll be a better leader because of it. Maybe he will listen to the people of your nation, and place it on the right track
2007-12-16 02:39:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think he'd be easier to beat then Hillary.
Obama can work a crowd on his own, make people like him. Hillary has to have Bill do all the heavy lifting of the campaign for her. And thats part of why the cookie is crumbling.
2007-12-16 02:36:45 · answer #7 · answered by Larry B 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think Obama is more beatable than Hillary just because I think he's more excitable (YEAH!). Put him in front of a camera long enough and he'll turn people away. What about Edwards though? He'd be my pick of the Dem 3.
2007-12-16 02:43:10 · answer #8 · answered by brandon r 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you haven't noticed the republicans wan't Hillary to win because just over half of America would never vote for her. That isn't stopping me though.
2007-12-16 02:42:49 · answer #9 · answered by Beaver 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe Hillary would be easy to beat she packs to much garbage from the past and many don't like her , obama is very likable. Hey i would like both to show the public their tax records , he will she wont
2007-12-16 02:38:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋