If fighting were an automatic 10 game suspension, and no player was allowed to fight, and you had the option to make on current penalty, legal…..what penalty would you make safe for game play?
You can’t fight, but now you can ___________________?
Example: You can’t fight but now you can high stick, because it is just a short version of fighting.
2007-12-15 16:01:16 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Hockey
Roughing. Simple, yet effective. lol
Oh, and legal facewashes.
2007-12-15 16:07:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
If fighting was eliminated, my hockey spectating would decrease significantly.
If I could make one current penalty legal, I would allow goalies to trip people. Watching goalies bully players brings me more joy than anything else in hockey. I had mountains of respect for Brodeur when he gave Sean Avery a big push.
2007-12-16 04:08:28 · answer #2 · answered by Grick 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You have to fight. When you fight you are protecting your team mates from cheap hits or high sticks. Fighting is as much of the game as is checking.
2007-12-16 11:57:30 · answer #3 · answered by moore4694 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think high sticking could be more dangerous then fighting!
I would say if there is no fighting then players should be able to ice the puck, charge another player, go offside, shoot the puck over the boards, have alot of players on the ice.. etc
Fighting is part of the game leave it alone!!!!!1
2007-12-16 00:06:39 · answer #4 · answered by fun35camera 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
How about since it's hockey they can still fight. Get rid of roughing penalties and that stupid over-the-glass and . . . etc.,etc.
2007-12-16 01:05:30 · answer #5 · answered by // 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Lame take-out slides. A real fun one would be making goaltender interference legal. Final score 22-18.
2007-12-16 00:11:26 · answer #6 · answered by Laying Low- Not an Ivy Leaguer 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Can't fight?Your not allowed to mess up there makeup then.
2007-12-16 09:31:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You can't fight, but now you can play the puck out of the trapezoid because the trapezoid is pointless.
2007-12-16 00:34:48 · answer #8 · answered by McMoose--RIPYAHS 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
fighting is part of the game and shouldn't be taken out
but if i had to choose it would be to allow players to hit the goalie if they come out of the crease.....i hate watching goalies take advantage of the rule
2007-12-16 01:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by Matt C 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
give an opponent one punch to the head without it being a penalty.
Play the puck not the man???? Do you even know how the game is played. God that is one of the dumbest answers of all time. Gratz, here's your sign.
2007-12-16 00:06:32 · answer #10 · answered by PuckDat 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋