English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-15 15:34:28 · 12 answers · asked by PRECiOSASâ?¢Â© 2 in Politics & Government Government

12 answers

No. I believe he is the worst president (even worse than Nixon) that this nation has ever had. He was an embarrassment when he tried to run his other companies (He financially ruined them) and I don't understand what made people think he could run a government.

2007-12-15 15:38:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

The view of President Bush may vary from person to person depending on there personal opinions. President Bush may be considered a good president in that so far he has not commited any felonies or moral problems in the White House. However, politically speaking, President Bush has difficulty discerning between good decisions and bad decisions. President Bush should be respected for his moral decency, but not necessarily for his law abilities.

2007-12-15 15:44:40 · answer #2 · answered by ARAX 2 · 1 2

No.

Here is what we've come to: A President blinded by power and privilege, oblivious to the devastation toward which he is pushing America and the world. An International corporate culture run amok, freed from restraints in every area from pollution control to health and safety standards to merciless price-gouging, even as the abuses slip quietly from the attention of corporate owned media. An economy trumpeted as "blooming" even while hundreds of thousands lose their jobs, slip into poverty, are left without homes or health care or enough to eat. A "Patriot Act" that makes all of us traitors if we speak out in any way the Washington thought militia deems threatening. Warrantless Wiretapping, Systemic Torture. Abuse of Detainees, Cherry-Picking Intelligence, Muzzling Truth tellers, Shredding our Constitution.

2007-12-16 03:43:59 · answer #3 · answered by jmf931 6 · 2 1

Good president? No. A good president would end the war. And Bush is incredibly stubborn. He is, of course, stubborn about the war, but he was also stubborn about the thing about the weapons in Iran. When we found out they weren't making them, he kept the same opinion about their danger.
But... I guess he tried.

2007-12-15 16:50:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think he is a moron. Its like a four year old being told what to do by an adult. You can't get mad at the four year old if an adult is whispering in his ear to steal money for candy.

If people should be mad at anyone, it should be whoever is pulling the strings whether it be Halliburton, the people who run the Federal Reserve, or both.

2007-12-15 15:41:32 · answer #5 · answered by Arcanum Noctis 5 · 1 1

do you meant (present) president no hell no he is killing the future of these country the Young man and woman that are dying for no reason,I really would like to see that Mr bush daughters will go to war so he can fell the pain of losing a love one is like it

2007-12-15 16:02:12 · answer #6 · answered by edward v 2 · 3 1

First term - yes.
Second term - no.

But I like the way he's been standing up to the Dems in Congress and making them look like fools since they took over.

2007-12-15 15:39:01 · answer #7 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 0 2

hes bankrupted everything hes touched....hes is the only corrupt member of his tribe that its also retarded

2007-12-15 15:44:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I really don't think we will know for a few years until all this pans out.. personally I don't care for him but was he right and me wrong?? I dunno.

2007-12-15 15:39:49 · answer #9 · answered by Ditka 7 · 0 1

nope hes a fag

2007-12-15 15:39:29 · answer #10 · answered by :] 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers