Conspiracy theorists always increase with time. Anyone with any sense knows that explosives weren't involved. Engineers have proved how the towers collapsed.
2007-12-15 15:26:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wego The Dog 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
5-10% of the usual nut jobs that are always looking for a conspiracy that isn't there. These are the same people that think the moon landing was faked.
I believe in certain conspiracies like JFK, RFK and Dr. King, but the WTC is insane.
Had the planes not hit, I would be all over this, but the concussive force of those impacts brought those buildings down.
Answer this, if it was a controlled explosion, why did the buildings stand for almost an hour before they collapsed?
These theories make no sense...
2007-12-15 15:40:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by wcowell2000 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is surprising how many sensible people actually believe this nonsense. I have just been involved in a heated exchange on a Yahoo group, supposedly inhabited by people with a high intelligence, who are convinced of some kind of plot, In researching answers to them, I discovered that a recent poll has shown that only 4.7% of the American people believe the incidents were caused other than by Arab hi-jackers flying the 'planes into the buildings.This is a sensible site which examines all the the conspiracies and provides evidence to refute then:- http://www.911myths.com/
2007-12-15 16:08:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by rdenig_male 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
probable as a results of fact my dimwitted usa hating moron, maximum peopld comprehend that the towers did not crumple for no reason. @ count extensive type em 2 jets with almost gas gas tanks have been flown into the towers as a strike against an usa image of wealth and ability. The ensuing flames burning at various thousadn tiers weakened the steel shape to the factor of crumple. The steel could have resisted the flames extra desirable in the event that they were lined with asbestos extremely of the sprayed on masking it had which had flacked off interior the years following the homes shape. So a number of the blame must be laid on the feet of the peopls who have been resposible for paying for asbestos banned in usa. i think of additionally you are the only tormented by lack of expertise, denial and ego besides the certainty that as dumb as that question substitute into i don't comprehend in case you recognize it.
2016-12-11 06:12:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by stockett 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since one person gave a percentage below 4% and another gave 13%, you are probably in the ballpark at 10%.
I did find it odd that the Patriot Act was written almost 7 months before the attack happened, but wasn't presented to Congress until after. However, that's the only conspiracy I see (and it is supported by the actual dates on the Act).
2007-12-15 17:03:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by loryntoo 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
ANYONE who watched as the second plane hit tower #2, KNEW that commercial jets had hit both towers.... if you watched ANY of the news reports you would have seen for a split second an AIRPLANE TIRE on the ground at the site.....this clip was also featured in the Nicolas Cage Movie--THE WORLD TRADE CENTER--- I was at work but we had small TV's (some of us)... and we watched in ABSOLUTE HORROR as the planes hit the tower... also, I am a New Yorker and 40 of my co-workers were lost that day.... all one had to do was WATCH THE PLANE HIT and the buildings tumble...
2007-12-15 16:01:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by LittleBarb 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's about 15%. Roughly the same percentage who don't believe that man landed on the Moon and that Elvis is still alive.
2007-12-15 18:33:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by desertviking_00 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it is more than 0% that means there are to many stupid people in this country. Seriouly I heard recently it was about 13%. Ridiculous.
2007-12-15 16:38:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by curious connie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I DO NOT think for one minute that bush and cheney, even with bush's bin laden connections had a hand in 911, I think after it happened they used it to their advantage.
2007-12-15 15:44:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No a plane crashed into it not explosives.
2007-12-15 15:22:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Successor 5
·
1⤊
1⤋