English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-15 14:17:43 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

4 answers

I am afraid it is possible to have a WW III. But it would not last long enough to make the news. The first bomb would be followed by the last know to man kind

2007-12-15 14:32:45 · answer #1 · answered by cwigg 3 · 0 0

I think that WWIII will be very different from the previous two in that I don't think it is possible for any kind of sneak attack. I believe that the major nuclear powers in the world would not push that button we hear so much about, but I think some hotheaded third world despot will. When the people who manned the Manhatten Project let Pandora out of the box, Albert Einstein, who had misgivings about what had been unleashed, was heard to say,"I know not with what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones." Thus it is imperative that these weapons are never more used on earth

2007-12-15 22:36:12 · answer #2 · answered by Stephen C 4 · 1 0

You're standing in the middle of it already....just because it doesn't "look" the last two doesn't preclude the fact that the globe isn't at war.

2007-12-16 08:27:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only if we got rid of the nuclear ****. otherwise its ARMAGEDDON AKA end of the world

2007-12-15 22:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers