who is next to be traded of sign with another MLB team?
My List is
Scott Rolen-Brewers
Ken Griffey Jr.-Braves
Jason Bay-Rangers
if traded Johan Santana- Red Sox
Roger Clemens if plays -Astros
Mark Prior-Astros
Barry Bonds-Angels
Livan Hernandez-Mets
what do u think will happen?
2007-12-15 14:07:47 · 12 answers · asked by icewhiterocker 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
I think the next player to switch teams is going to be Livan Hernandez, since he is probably out of a job with Haren, Webb, Randy Johnson, Micah Owings as sure starters and doug davis as the guy likely to get the fifth spot. I think the Mets would be a good fit, as well as maybe the Blue Jays, Milwalkee, Washington and maybe even Kansas City.
2007-12-15 14:13:26 · answer #1 · answered by VRP 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know if Mark Prior has signed with the Houston Astros yet, or any of the playoffs that you are writing about, have joined the teams that you have listed for. All I know right now, is that Mark Prior could sign with the Chicago White Sox, but you have to doubt that will happen. Any of these players could end up signing with one of any of the teams that are in baseball, not like I am seeing Jason Bay coming to Chicago, to play for either the Cubs or White Sox. Or even Ken Griffey Jr going to the Alanta Braves. We just have to see what will happen, and do you really think the Angels will give Barry Bonds a chance, since his name is on the Mitchell report for taking steroids? Let's just not guess where players might end up going, and what to see what will happen in reality.
2007-12-15 14:23:06 · answer #2 · answered by staggmovie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Brewers dont need Scott Rolen. Rookie of the Year Ryan Braun?
Ken Griffey Jr would go to an AL team if anything because of his tired legs and preventing injuries.
Mark Prior to the Yankees. Whether he helps the bullpen or the rotation
And if any team Johan Santana to the Yankees.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3156038
2007-12-15 14:14:42 · answer #3 · answered by Doc Yankee30™ 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Santana-Yankees
Rolen-Brewers
Griffey, Jr-Braves
Bay-Indians
Clemens-Betty Ford Clinic
Bonds- Alcatraz
Prior-Rangers
Livan-NY Mets
Pujols-Red Sox
2007-12-15 14:56:49 · answer #4 · answered by birdfoot 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A coward roots for the Yankees - except they have been born and raised a Yankees fan. somebody who has no dedication who decide for them as their team is a front-runner. What a accident it is that a team with 26 titles consumes a disproportionally great fan base that seems Cowboy-ish? pay attention - do no longer end on the Mets. they have had their united statesand downs. you will hate your self rooting for the Yankees regardless of the undeniable fact that. It does no longer sense organic. one ingredient approximately Mets followers you could desire to love is the intensity. the fact we don't have BS followers who in basic terms watch for the period of the postseason or say they are Yankees followers because of the fact it sounds cool makes us a extra unified fan base. We cherish the circumstances we win extra. The Yankees have been given their very own heritage and legacy and that's superb and all, whether it is no longer very well worth plenty while maximum of of your followers at the instant are not into it. it is stunning how the Mets garner plenty interest even whilst sucking, whilst the Yankees are doing super, or perhaps the soccer communities are. The Mets at the instant are not the Yankees - yet something it is user-friendly, that has extremes highs and lows. in case you reside interior the long island section, it is going to likely be annoying rooting for yet another team that may not the Yankees (surprisingly if it is no longer on television). i'd advise going for an underdog form team - like Tampa or Colorado. whether it won't sense correct. purely save watching the Mets. decrease your expectancies till Minaya and Manuel are out. they are poisons. regrettably, so are the Wilpons, yet we are caught with them for now. If the Phillies weren't thriving, it would be much less complicated on us. it is like the Braves of the late-ninety's - different than with a predictably much less long-term, yet the two useful international sequence high quality triumphing team. everybody apart from Jimmy Rollins - who has an ungainly obsession for the Mets, and discrased his call by making use of stating an unworthy team in his '08 WS speech, their team performs with integrity and sophistication (whether their closer sucks balls).
2016-11-03 10:13:31 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scott Rolen... why the hell would the Brewers need Rolen? They've got Ryan Braun
Griffey:- Reds haven't engaged in ANY trade talks about him.
Jason Bay- possible...
Bonds... no one's going to sign him...
Next name in my opinion is Cliff Floyd going to Tampa Bay.
2007-12-15 14:33:49 · answer #6 · answered by Reduviidae 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As a lifelong Brewer fan I would welcome Scott Rolen for the right price. As much of a fan of Ryan Braun as I am, he is an awful defensive third baseman. The Cards price for Rolen seems to be pretty steep still.
2007-12-15 14:39:54 · answer #7 · answered by Ken 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with Clemens and Bonds (both are out of MLB in '08); and I can't see Griffey in Atlanta.
2007-12-16 02:28:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Santana to the Red Sox or Yankees
2007-12-16 00:47:42 · answer #9 · answered by Max B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a lot of people are all like rolen to the brewers what?
but the brewers said they want to find a third basemen so they can move braun to left field... i agree but rolen would have to be awesome at the hot corner
2007-12-15 14:57:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋