Yes, exactly--dictatorships that want to run the world with a low-grade communism.
Help Fight Globalism!!!!!
2007-12-15 12:01:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sorry to disagree with you but either someone is feeding you a lot of garbage, or you were absent when organization was discussed in the corporations course. The corporation which has the "dictator" will soon vanish. The CEO cannot have dissention within his ranks. The goals established by the Board of Directors are a target. The chiefs of the various segments of the Corp. have their targets to meet the corporate objective. No one is a slave. The very best corporations have executives who work in harmony with one another. The poorest or those with slovenly management usually end upbeing swallowed by another who immediately cleans house.
2007-12-15 12:22:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by googie 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
there's a distinction between communism and socialism. Communism is a state wherein theoretically all are equivalent and none has extra fabric possesions than somebody else. needless to say each and every thing is owned by making use of the state and no inner maximum initiatives are inspired. Socialism (the place united states of america IS shifting in the direction of) is while the goverment has a place equivalent to the situation a determine has together with his newborn. It place is to intervene while issues are going incorrect and or there is social injustice brought about by making use of something. for occasion 30.000 workers being fired from a company. Socialism is a device it is wide-unfold predominantly in eu countries. whether it ought to no longer artwork completely, it does supply workers and electorate with certain healthcare and pensions and workers rights. In each and every of the final would be a balanced mix of capitalism and socialism
2016-11-03 09:57:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by durrett 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a corporation its called accountability.
The CEO answers to the board of directors. The board of directors answers to the stock holders. It's really an effective organization.
A "socialist corporation" now that's hilarious... corporations couldn't afford to run like a corrupt government.
2007-12-15 12:34:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Freedom Guy 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think you are misinformed.
The CEO answers to a board of directors elected by the shareholders. The real power lies with the majority shareholder.
2007-12-15 12:53:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by raichasays 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
That is a bit of an exaggeration, the CEO is accountable to the Board of Directors and the shareholders. They can get fired and do get fired all the time. Of course the do get "golden parachutes" when this happens, usually.
2007-12-15 11:57:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Every corp. is different, but if the owners (shareholders) elect the board of directors and the board hires a CEO, that sounds a bit democratic to me.
2007-12-15 11:56:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Paladin 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
You forget that most huge corporations have a board of directors that oversee the CEO.
2007-12-15 11:57:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
In the words of former Prime Minister Thatcher "Consensus is the lack of leadership" Ceo's for the most part got to where they are for a reason.......they know what works. More importantly, they know what doesn't.
2007-12-15 12:10:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kirk 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
You have got to be kidding me! Can you imagine any company being able to conduct business otherwise? "We need to acquire another company or diversify our investments, let's put this up for vote by all employees." Unless the employees own stock in the company, they don't have a vote. It's not rocket science.
2007-12-15 12:02:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
1⤊
2⤋