If the election came down to Romney and Edwards, who would you vote for and why?

Answer 1

I'd vote for Edwards, he strives to eliminate poverty, from a universal health care system and leave Iraq. The nation is in desperate need of relief from these republican douche bags, and Romney falls into this category. I mean come on Romney wants to double the size of Guantanamo, torture prisoners, and keep up the futile war effort in Iraq. If you want four more years of a Bush clone than you want Romney.

Answer 2

Edwards. I just don't trust Romney. Edwards has also been pretty successful with fighting against lobbyists and big corporations. He's definitely concerned with the middle class and thats what I believe is important.

Answer 3

there is an bumper-decal I see sometimes: "If vote casting particularly replaced something it does no longer be allowed." the two events at the instant do no longer particularly believe rank-and-report electorate to %. a candidate. The candidate is picked early-on interior the technique. The social gathering leaders direct contributions and %money in the direction of him, he enters the race with the main money and is dealt with by making use of the media, from that element on, because of the fact the presumptive winner. look at GW Bush! He got here into the race in 2000 with numerous money, I forget how plenty, whether it became into 1000's and 1000's of greenbacks. His human beings insisted this all got here from small donations, averaging $3 hundred, from everywhere in the rustic, yet this became into at a time while maximum folk exterior of Texas does no longer have recognized Bush if he'd shown up on their doorstep. look at Hillary right this moment. She is claiming 1000's of donations below $1000 from working-class areas the place traditionally no longer one in 10,000 human beings donates extra effective than $5 to a candidate. And her husband, in 1992, became into plenty the comparable. enormously much the day he introduced his candidacy he became into the chief, even regardless of the undeniable fact that maximum folk interior the rustic did no longer even understand who he became into! Politicians do no longer particularly like democracy. it is messy. it is unpredictable. And it would not continually produce the outcomes they desire. For years the candidate became into picked on the tip of the technique, in a smoke-filled room on the convention or purely till now it. at the instant the candidate is picked on the commencing up of the technique, so the convention is not any extra effective than an infomercial, no longer even well worth media coverage any extra.

Answer 4

Ron Paul, because he votes in accordance with the Constitution more than Romney and Edwards combined.

Answer 5

John Edwards.

I hope he is not the Democratic nominee but I consider Romney to have no real convictions. He has taken a 360 degree turn on every issue in the recent years. I dont like the way he talks about Massachusetts and he is out of touch with real Americans.

Answer 6

Edwards, because he opposes the war, defends civil liberties, and reallocation of resources for social welfare. Romney is a corporate stooge, intolerant , and the same as Bush. He is also a chameleon, having changed his politics in order to run for President as a Republican

Answer 7

Edwards, he is the lesser of 2 evils. Then I would probably either move to Canada or commit hara kiri. I want Hillary as Prez. Don't much care who disagrees with me.

Answer 8

Edwards. Romney has the worst ideals of any candidate...

Answer 9

Romney. I prefer his party's platform to Edwards'.

It is never about the man in the general election, it is always about the platform.

But I'd love to see a moderate Independent instead!!!!

Answer 10

Edwards off course, Flopney has changed his position on every issue . He has changed on abortion, gun, immigration, gay marriage. You must be a moron to believe this guy and vote for him.