2007-12-15 09:42:36 · 8 answers · asked by The One 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sway_27 is right. those two would not show up if they weren't getting cash. they want to avoid poor and hungry, even if they made them that way.
2007-12-15 10:16:35 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. Mallikarjun 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the question is a moot point...what does that have to do with anything. hillary has been at churches and im sure vince fosters family would have some colorful comments about that or billy dales, the person she ruined with travelgate. my point is what possible difference could it make even if the figure was available.
2007-12-15 18:10:56 · answer #2 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rush steers clear of religion. Bush hasn't forced his religious beliefs down any body's throats.
Besides, neither of them are as funny as the Justice Brothers.
2007-12-15 17:48:29 · answer #3 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because they are not men of the cloth . I have to agree with you about the greatness of Rush & GB ; but , after all - we go to church to pray .
2007-12-15 18:20:58 · answer #4 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
These 2 men have never forced their religious beliefs on anyone, but they do have the right to express their opinions.
Why are you so full of vitriol?
2007-12-15 18:09:17 · answer #5 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lots I imagine. Just because you aren't reading in the New York Times doesn't mean its not happening.
2007-12-15 17:46:50 · answer #6 · answered by John 16 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most churches are too busy helping the poor people in their communities, communities across the nation and people in other countries. they normally do not sit around complaining about how unfair life is.
2007-12-15 17:46:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nobody dubbed them as leaders.
2007-12-15 17:45:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋