http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msZADSW9g7I&NR=1
2007-12-15 09:08:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Without a doubt..... Now you understand why our correspondence today reflects the censorship of the powers that be.....
They just can not afford for the truth to be shared.
2007-12-15 09:21:34 · answer #1 · answered by Dream Realized 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This military mess started because Bill Clintoon slashed the military to an unrecoverable point, you can’t make new Divisions without gutting other Division so rather than having more 10 Divisions you have 8 combat ready and 3 not combat ready Divisions. Bill Clintoon and all of his Social cronies should be held responsible for the Military blunders because they have to scramble to protect the United States. It will take 50 years to get over the way the Democrats under Clintoons direction have screwed this country. And if this other Clintoon gets in we will never recover.
2007-12-15 17:30:10 · answer #2 · answered by Flyflinger 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not know what party has to do with it. But clearly the commander and chief has demonstrated to the world that being a super power is absolutely useless. The threat of having the worlds most powerful Military was so much more of a threat before we demonstrated that any country can defeat any other country in a war using guerrilla warfare. I know many people will criticize this answer by saying when have we ever lost a battle? Battles are won with might. Wars are won by the country that give up last. They do not have to win one battle to win a war.
2007-12-15 17:18:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, The democrat party under Clinton and Carter
was definitely the WORST for the US Military.
The Republican Party has been the best under PRESIDENT George W. Bush for the US Military.
2007-12-15 17:28:10 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Republican Party MUST have some groups to hate; that's how they get votes, and they need an army to back them up & make financial profit off of. It's just that's the way things are, and people vote for it.
2007-12-15 17:18:51 · answer #5 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no unilateral surrender from the pelosi/reid regime is
2007-12-15 17:31:38 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-12-15 17:12:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yawwwnnnnn!!!!
2007-12-15 17:33:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hell yeah !!!
2007-12-15 17:14:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋