http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_iG-IBG7h4&feature=related
2007-12-15 08:45:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
lilly coo
Thats right - he got to be a 4 star General and a supreme allied commander and so on because he has "no credibilty" and everyone hates him
And what is your rank and expiernce and how many invasions have you commanded ?
None - Oh what a surprise - no wonder you think that you know better and do not have to listen to a dire warning from a US command staff person who loves his nation
Wow spoted it all from 100 feet did we ?
2007-12-15 09:15:20 · update #1
there was World War I then World War II Bush will make World War C.
2007-12-15 09:26:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
General Clarke has became a politician, not a military expert. Clarke's politicizing for the last few years has cost him a lot of objectivity.
BTW. He was never a "US supreme commander", there never was a title of that. Clarke was the supreme NATO commander in Bosnia; that does not make him the second coming of Eisenhower or Schwarzkopf.
>General Clarke never commanded any invasions, either. I was in command of the peace-keeping troops that the NATO sent into Bosnia. Once again, he was no Eisenhower.
2007-12-15 09:25:18 · answer #2 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It would be a nice pipe dream to hit Iran, however, too many other countries in the world rely on them for oil and need Iran's money and will sell them weapons and who knows, maybe some plutonium or uranium.
2007-12-15 09:01:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok, we already understand that Iran is a terrorist state and helps many terrorist communities. correct now we are frightened particularly approximately Iran procuring nuclear weapons and then passing those weapons off to terrorist communities. President Bush won't be able to declare international warfare 3. the international ought to keep in touch till now its a international warfare. I would desire to ask your self, what precisely is it approximately international warfare 3 thats scares you so very plenty?
2016-11-03 09:27:43 · answer #4 · answered by hosfield 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think with the latest NIA Report, he would be foolish to start a war with Iran.
He will not have the support of Congress or the American People.
2007-12-15 08:50:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i dont think so.
most people no longer are on our side or Iraqs side.
We might go to war with Iran, but not a WW3
2007-12-15 08:57:20 · answer #6 · answered by xScenestaaax 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
World War 3 is bound to happen whether Bush had taken office or not. its all thanks to the U.S always disagreeing with China and Russia. thats just the way it is.
2007-12-15 09:08:08 · answer #7 · answered by Razgriz01 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WW III started already our invite to it was 9/11.
Those who deny it I suggest you look up
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
To see what we are up against.
It isn't all about Bush.
2007-12-15 08:57:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
General Clarke isn't someone with a great deal of credibility any longer, other than to an Uber liberal mindset.
2007-12-15 08:52:04 · answer #9 · answered by Mark A 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
oh brother...gen. wes clark...not a real credible source..since it is known that the troops under his command hated him and the pentagon thought he was a pompas ***
2007-12-15 09:09:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋