Israel wants the USA to destroy any country in the Middle East that it deems to be a threat. So far we have done this (For Israel and for our Oil conglomerates) at the cost of our own security and physical and economic and there still is no peace for Israel. Wouldn't it be better if the we (USA) stopped pandering to Israeli fear and told her to work harder at making friends and less hard at making enemies?
2007-12-15 07:43:08 · 7 answers · asked by Larry A 5 in Politics & Government ➔ International Organizations
The answerw so far point directly to the paranoia. Of course Arab politicans speak boldly if cartonnishly about wiping Israel out. Iasrael was set down in Palistine without anybody's permission and has been practicing cultural genocide since. But middle Eastern leaders know Israel is there to stay, but they must keep the anger of the people in check. When as the last time any naiton attacked Israel? When was the last time Israel attacked a Middle Estern nation?
So get a grip on reality and stop feeding your paranoia with fantasies.
P.S. Every peace treaty Israel takes more from the Palistinians. Proof? Look at the map of Palistine today and compare it to the map of Palistine in the 1940's. And please, let's stop the name calling. "Anti-Semetic " appplies to the Palistinians not the Israelis who are mostly of mixed European ancestery. Face reality.
2007-12-15 19:51:37 · update #1
US must stop supporting Israel so that terrorism will be eliminated and there will be no problem with the supply of oil.
2007-12-16 19:04:53 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Saying that the USA does something solely for Israel's interests and not its own, in other words, a variation on "the Jews control the US government" is the thing that sounds like paranoia to me, not to mention anti semitic.
And for the record, since Israel's inception most Arab states have been in an official "state of war" with it even if for most of that time the state of war hasn't been hot. As it stands now, there is a country nearby whose leader has made threats to it and has definitely had a nuclear weapons program in the past. Thus, it is logical to be concerned about such developments. To not be concerned would itself be a problem.
Update:
Yet some more distortions of reality. The Arab leaders keep the "anger of their people" in check? That is so rich. If anything, it is the Arab leaders over the past 60 years who have helped perpetuate myths about Israel which has lead to many of the problems that the Middle East has found it in. Your attempt to portray them as a "moderating force" (aparrently in an attempt to further your premise that Israeli are "paranoid") is quite laughable.
And for the record, the term "anti Semite" and "anti semitism" specifically refers to "Jew hatred", the definition of "Semite" notwithstanding. That is the dictionary definition. But it is a common tactic to use the "anti semitism applies to the Arabs!" non argument as well as the faintly anti semitic "The Jews are not really semites" non argument that you attempt.
Ah well. The more you write the more you show yourself to be ignorant.
2007-12-15 16:37:03 · answer #2 · answered by BMCR 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The land belongs to Israel, so Palestineans ought to stay of their very own land, besides as any others who desire to declare the land. Then there would be peace. Israel has penned 2 or 3 peace agreements yet they are on no account venerated by making use of the different edge, so as that may not working. no person ever seems to be satisfied with what they have already have been given.
2016-11-03 09:20:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's see: the Arabs (led by the Palestinians) say that their purpose is to "erase the illegal state of Israel" and to "kill every last Israeli pig (a vicious slur coming from Arabs and going to Jews, right?), that Jews eat (yes, eat!) Arab children, and so on and so forth.
The Jews say that they'd like to "live in peace under a two-state solution".
See the difference, Binky?
Now, I'm not saying that one side or the other is all right or all wrong - just that the typical (no, not ALL of it!) rhetoric is just slightly different coming from the leading newspapers of the two sides. You HAVE read English-language Arab press to see what it and Arab leaders have to say about the state of Israel, right? If not, it will make your hair stand on end!
2007-12-15 07:59:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They not paranoia, they're crazy about arabs people
They have complete control of u.s govn't and all the politicians
They get 10 billions dollars in aid from u.s to provide free housing, medical and school for every jews in israel. Anyone bi.tching about it consider anti-semitic craps.
They control 99% of all u.s and 75% of europe medias, included this f*.cking yahoo
2007-12-16 10:00:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The US has dug its own grave. Isreal does not benifit from a stronger Iran and Iraq in chaos.
2007-12-15 12:56:46 · answer #6 · answered by Citizen1984 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Response to your answer to my question... the Nazi Regime was Teutonic pagan, not christian.
2007-12-18 20:18:27 · answer #7 · answered by . 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋