You have only two parties, if both of these parties agree on something which majority may not agree youhave no choice. Both of these parties have to get fund from major corporates. Mostly same companies provide funds to both of the candidates. It is impossible for a person to win election without raising the funds. So, is this really possible to make a political decision which is against the interest of multinationals and in support of common man.
2007-12-15 03:38:39 · 2 answers · asked by Happily Happy 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
not anymore.
2007-12-15 03:42:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It relies upon how one define and stay democracy. A coalition style democracy like in Italy had and nevertheless has its flaws. i think of that in the time of very vast international places like Russia and China (Russia isn't a genuine democracy in case you already know what I mean) a one party gadget supposedly enables against the disintegration of the country (to no longer guard the chinese language gadget!). It contemplate whether a brilliant united states like the U. S. ought to safeguard a greater party gadget democracy the place you somewhat have a decision? Europe (apart from the united kingdom?) has a greater party democratic gadget the place with the intention to get the votes you may stand interior the midst of the political spectrum. nevertheless, it is nevertheless greater suitable to have a 2 party "democracy" than no democracy in any respect interior the U. S..
2017-01-08 10:20:39 · answer #2 · answered by petrovich 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋