From my experience I would say that there are several things that you are not taking into account. There are several human populations that have adapted to cold weather quite successfully. American Indian Eskimos are one group that shows several cold weather adaptations. (Short thick limbs and bodies for heat retention. Undescended testicles in males. Dentition is another related issue ) The Chinese are another, that have the epicanthal fold, which in effect gives them built in snow goggles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicanthal_fold
Another thing you may not be considering is the ingenuity of the people who lived in your house before you did. They likely survived on local fuel sources like firewood, which was probably abundant and renewable at the time. Do you burn wood today ? They also may have made deep feather beds, which they may not have gotten out of in the mornings until eleven o’clock, or later, on a cold day. They may have taken live embers and coals to bed with them in iron pots wrapped in towels to help keep themselves warm, which was a common practice predating the electric blanket. If you have pets and ever experience a very cold night without power you may develop an appreciation for the old expression, ‘A three dog night.’
Another thing that you may be overlooking is the survival rate of those days. Yes, a lot of people did die. People weren’t much, if any, tougher than they are today as a whole and may have been even less equipped for the day-to-day struggle for survival. A lot of them didn’t make it, or make it for very long. Remember that the life expectancy of an adult male was only 40 years up until not that long ago as far as human history is concerned
2007-12-15 05:34:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by mindoversplatter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
just to instruct i'm paying interest, besides the reality that Trevor is positively extra effective recommended than i'm, and because this simpleminded precis could succeed to a pair people. The sunspot mechanism has been invoked to describe the Maunder minimum, yet a reducing of finished image voltaic output by using 0.4% looks extra in all probability. The sunspot mechanism isn't intrinsically improbable. Fewer sunspots, weaker image voltaic magnetic field, extra cosmic rays getting by to earth and seeding very severe cloud, inflicting cooling. How correct this is to the final decade, i don't understand adequate to assert. Sealevel upward push is gradual as a results of main contribution from thermal enlargement of the oceans, this is an extremely long-term technique. So the worst-case concern of around 7 m would ensue over centuries. that's all stated at some intensity in Houghton "international warming, the finished briefing". Houghton became into of direction Professor at that infamous den of iniquity, the atmospheric physics branch of the college of Oxford
2016-10-11 08:24:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. The ability too tolerate extremes of weather rest solely within the individual. There are people that are very tolerate of cold, like the Inuit.
You see there is a problem with your question. You use the word "we". That includes all humans existing at the time you post your question.
All of us should choose our words more carefully. Particularly words like never, ever, forever, we, us, them, who and promise.
2007-12-15 03:34:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
all they do was lot of excercise and organic food
+tension free living i mean not running after money etc
in this era of readymade we r really spoiling our life as we r moving more away from our mother nature
2007-12-15 03:12:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by rajat jain 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
No , We can tolerate it if we have to , but we just don't want to.
2007-12-15 03:14:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Average Joe 5
·
1⤊
0⤋