English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-15 02:56:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

Actually, every recount showed that Gore lost in florida in 2000, even the ones done after it was all decided.

2007-12-15 02:59:54 · answer #1 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 6 1

The answer is none! ALGore never led. Al Gore tried to get the lead by interpreting votes much like a séance. Al Gore in select Democratic counties in Florida was telling people (drive-by media) that he could tell voters intent by looking at hanging chad. That these voters didn't want to vote for someone else they wanted to vote for Algore but were not smart enough or strong enough to push little paper chad out of the way.

2007-12-15 03:18:43 · answer #2 · answered by bob e 1 · 3 0

They finished counting every single vote in Florida and Al Gore lost. Regardless of what people tell you, he never, EVER would have won in Florida. Whether they left it as reported from day one, left it as counted from the time of the Supreme Court vote, or counted them all post win; Al Gore lost.

2007-12-15 03:10:04 · answer #3 · answered by Ollie 3 · 4 0

As USA Today summarized, on May 11, 2001:

"Who would have won if Al Gore had gotten manual counts he requested in four counties? Answer: George W. Bush."

"Who would have won if the U.S. Supreme Court had not stopped the hand recount of undervotes, which are ballots that registered no machine-readable vote for president? Answer: Bush, under three of four standards."

"Who would have won if all disputed ballots — including those rejected by machines because they had more than one vote for president — had been recounted by hand? Answer: Bush, under the two most widely used standards; Gore, under the two least used."

2007-12-15 03:05:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

look, GET OVER IT. the studies were done and he lost em all...and given his knowing and willing participation in the clinton...":legacy" he should have. the idea of casting the tie breaking vote to tax social security is an abomination. bottom line...good riddance. again, your answere is NONE.

2007-12-15 03:22:07 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 4 0

According to final results, he lost. But who actually cares? I mean I obviously don't.

2007-12-15 03:06:50 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 1

Excellent question bro, I would also like to hear answers to this.

2007-12-15 03:02:16 · answer #7 · answered by Jubal S 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers