If you're looking for a science answer, the leading candidates would be the zero point field or intersecting M-branes. The other answer, God, true of false, can never be a science answer.
2007-12-15 03:17:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frank N 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
When faced with a contradiction, examine your premises. You say it "...can only exist because of one component".
This is where you go astray - only "nothing" exists with just one component -- itself.
My advice? Reword the question to remove the false assumption.
2007-12-15 13:15:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your choice of the words "creation" and "manifestation" tells me you were looking for someone to say "God." You are so transparent. But you are also wrong to do so.
To look for evidence of God is wrong because it betrays your weakness of faith. We already know from the Bible that only through FAITH will you come to God. We know that Jesus believed his kingdom was not of this world. We know that when Satan tempted Jesus to test God's existence (when in the desert), Jesus rebuked him for the idea. You aren't supposed to look for evidence of God. That would be testing God. And we ALL know who asked for that test before, don't we?
Looking at any form of creationism is an attempt to find God. But God is perfect, rght? He will not have made any mistakes that leave evidence after all those admonitions about faith. So that means that any god (note: lower case) you find that way is too weak to make things perfect. In other words, a lesser god. And we know you should not put other gods before God. But there is one being who wants you to do that - Satan.
To me, "intelligent design" is HERESY because it requires us to assume there is evidence of God's creation. Yet if God is perfect, there will BE no evidence, only the weakness of Man finding some alternate meaning in ambiguous evidence - a meaning that was never really there. Satan would love for you to keep up this search - and thereby turn away from God.
I view it this way: If God is truly perfect, then He made the perfect cosmos for us to study. He left fossil records for us to study. He left all sorts of interesting puzzles for us to study. Science is the way to study them. Why don't we just play with what God gave us and leave it at that? Knowing that when we play, we will never find the Maker's mark anywhere.
And if there IS no God, then.. why seek that which doesn't exist? Either way, study your science. Either because God built us those puzzles and it is a shame to waste them, or because there is no God, there is only science. Either way, study science.
2007-12-15 09:20:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by The_Doc_Man 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Hi, you're thinking like a scientist, for a question that science hasn't reached, and will probably never reach.
2007-12-15 09:03:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Marcos P 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is a question which presupposes an answer, to which there is none, as it is meaningless, and void. Go to: "Religion & Spirituality", under: "Society & Culture".
2007-12-15 10:37:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
This will take you ten life times to answer, why cant you ask what the key ingredient is to Jell-O?
2007-12-15 09:35:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by earthball50@sbcglobal.net 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
oxygen and water
2007-12-15 10:04:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by jstchel 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
cell
2007-12-15 09:33:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by aswin_james 2
·
0⤊
1⤋