Is workman's compensation a good fair way of helping those who get hurt on the job get the right kind of sett

Answer 1

Not always. My mom is a paralegal for state worker's comp in my hometown. The state where worker's comp is still a gov ruled entity, it does no good. Claims are routinly denied simply bc the gov doesnt want to pay the bills.

My homestate's worker's comp is now a private insurance company. From what my mom tells me, I have noticed two things. More claims are getting approved, for one. This is a help to the people who do get inured on the job. However, the employer fees to carry worker's comp insurance (which is a requirement of any business that has any employees in my home state) is getting higher and higher. This is causing employees to be laid off from small or locally owned businesses.

Answer 2

I don't think so. It is to employer asvantage. In 1972 my left arm was crushed by a drunk co worker. I had 8 major operations. And final outcome of being 25% disabled. At the time of injury I was making $16.90 per hour. My permanent injury award was $4000, minus $2200 in attorney fees, $1800 in other unpaid doctor bills, and $800 in airfare, rental car and hotel bills to appear at hearings. So, I took a net loss for the privilege. And Workmen's Compensation (California) prevents you from suing in court. Workmen's Compensation board presides. And my first doctor who gave me a real good and nearly fatal case of osteo myelitis could not be sued either. Oh! nearly forgot. I was awarded lifetime medical care related to the injury All I have to do is ask the insurance company. Since 1978, I have asked for care a number of times. They always say they can't find my paperwork so I get no care. So in the past 30 years or so, I have spent about $80,000 paying for plenty of medical care, advanced diagnostics like ct scans, nuclear ct scans, MRI's, pain treatment, physical therapy and twice was about to have surgery except for lack of funds or insurance But the insurance checks every few years, hoping I'm dead so they can tear up their court papers for responsibility

Get injured and refuse Workman's Compensation you can sue in court. Course you have to pay your medical till then as well as no income. It is definitely in favor of the employer.

Answer 3

The laws vary in each state. I know CA used to give out large worker's comp payouts and they've cut way back due to a law Arnold passed. Basically I think it helps people get fair settlements.

Answer 4

you're rattling proper it quite is honest. we've been slaves to the banks for long sufficient. all of us want a secure place to shop our money and those crooks rob us blind and then act like their FDIC coverage is a God given proper to raid our tax money and pay us decrease back with our very own money while their Ponzi scheme catches up with them. confident, even those few who have not taken the bailout money relax complication-free understanding they are in a position to later if their spending sprees crash their banks. proscribing their repayment is the 1st considerable sign to me that Obama could be a sturdy president.

Answer 5

Its nothing more than a legel way of hurting emploees, who are already hurt, its a joke!!!!