Time for a change. Time for a woman.
2007-12-14 17:33:03 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
NO! I'm not against a woman being President. But not Madame Clinton.
2007-12-14 17:35:40 · answer #1 · answered by airlines charge for the seat. 5 · 8⤊ 3⤋
It is time for change and a woman may just be the ticket. Male politicians are over worked and in need of a break. Eight years should be sufficient and another eight if things go well.
We have a candidate qualified and battle ready to fill those big loafers. The Oval office will "ring" again as President Hillary Clinton will re-conned the phone lines.
2007-12-14 18:53:55 · answer #2 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel elected Golda Meier in 1950s. Sirimavo Bandar Naike was elected in Sri Lanka in the early 1960s.Britain elected Margaret Thatcher in 1975. Then India , Pakistan, Bangladesh, Phillipines elected their PMs / Presidents. In South America elected their woman Presidents already twice. Eve n Germany joined this elite group recently.USA has been a hesitant starter and then finding all excuses to get rid of the Pioneer , who has been taking all brick bats.
2007-12-14 21:40:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Here's a list of all the " experience " madame Clinton has
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=hills_big_goof_--_in_primaries,_experience_loses&ns=DickMorrisandEileenMcGann&dt=12/14/2007&page=2
2007-12-15 02:21:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
For a lot of people, "Heil Hitler" had a nice ring to it too...shave him, put a blonde wig on him and grow him a set of t-ts and you've got Hitlary Clinton!!!! I agree the States needs a woman/minority president for a change, but NOT Hilary Clinton!! You think Bush is bad?! He's got NOTHING on Hitlary...she's been pulling Bill's strings behind the scenes since he was governor of Arkansas...remember that. And the love for Bill Clinton's administration wasn't much better than the love for the Bush admin...keep that in mind too!
RON PAUL IN 2008!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-12-14 18:30:17 · answer #5 · answered by Jesus Murphy 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes, it is about time to have a women president. But, make sure that obama does not get nominated first.
2007-12-15 02:18:08 · answer #6 · answered by T E 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i am australian but always thought bill was pretty good, and yeah a woman might be a nice change. you won't know until you elect her and then if it doesn't go well don't blame it on her being a woman, i am sure there will be other reasons that are more valid than her sex. we don't say all male presidents/prime ministers are..........not good at their jobs (see no swearing, hard for an aussie) there are people of.....interesting character in all jobs be they male or female, but it would be nice to see a female have the influence of a president.
there seem to be alot of people out there who are intimidated by the thought of a woman being president, i wonder what they are scared of.
of course she has to be up to the job, although i wonder how many male presidents really didn't perform well?
you guys take this all way too serious. relax a little.
2007-12-14 17:40:17 · answer #7 · answered by ari 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Madame Preident Clinton of which country? Surely you can't be talking about the US.
2007-12-14 17:39:44 · answer #8 · answered by Tom V 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Um, no. Just plain President Clinton. Do we call Madame President Bush that way, to distinguish him from the first President Bush?
That said, it's time for a woman to lead the greatest nation.
2007-12-14 17:42:05 · answer #9 · answered by countsin 2 · 3⤊ 6⤋
Only if her name is Laura Roslin. I hope you aren't one of those idiots who is voting for Clinton just for a change of pace in the oval office, gender-wise. You need to wise up and focus on the issues.
2007-12-14 17:37:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋