Hehehehehe - you will get only conjecture here.
No proof exists.
2007-12-14 14:59:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
7⤊
6⤋
GW mentioned we had to invade Iraq because of the fact they have been harboring and supporting al-quaida terrorists. After the invasion they found that there became ONE AQ terrorist in Baghdad (al-zarquieri??) and he became there on his very own getting scientific interest at a wellness facility. AND he became there without the understanding or tips of Saddam's administration. GW mentioned no person interior the Whitehouse became in contact interior the CIA leak. final week BUSH'S aide S. McCllelan mentioned the whole senior paintings rigidity knew approximately it until eventually now it occurred. GW mentioned he could punish all people in contact in th leak. He COMMUTED Libby's sentence after Libby became CONVICTED IN court docket. Then there became WMD's, and then there became the gun administration rules he mentioned he could refuse to sign, then there became the promise to chop back government, then there became the pledge to run the administration as a economic conservative. Is that sufficient? If i assumed you may surely re-evaluate your place, i could proceed, even with the incontrovertible fact that it relatively is a waste of the two our time.
2016-12-11 05:09:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
katydid, like a typical liberal you are making up stuff. Bush never claimed the war would take a few months. From the very beginning the war was defined as a long term war of many years.
Liberals, what is Hillary's position on the war today? Does she have one?
2007-12-14 15:19:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Freedom Guy 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
There is a lot of proof! On the day of 9/11 our president simply sat their and continued to read the book to children at a school instead of doing something about it. He claims that we went to Iraq for "weapons of mass destruction" when their were NONE to be found. Osama Bin Laddin & Suddam Huissan were just terrorists that were discovered and kind of an excuse to go to Iraq as well. Honestly, Iraq is one of the biggest oil countries in the entire world! Wiki says "Comprising 112 billion barrels of proven oil, Iraq ranks second in the world behind Saudi Arabia in the amount of Oil reserves; the United States Department of Energy estimates that up to 90% of the country remains unexplored. These regions could yield an additional 100 billion barrels. Iraq's oil production costs are among the lowest in the world " Another thing I disliked about GWB was that he seemed to always be on vacation instead of working
2007-12-14 15:02:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by This Is How The World Ends 4
·
4⤊
5⤋
Proving a negative...
where are the WMD's?
So you don't approve of the media...but I'm sure you read your latest Right Wing chain email. Right Wingers must hate snopes.com, because that debunks all the junk chain email the Right Wingers put out.
2007-12-14 15:34:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
so i guess fox news is credible?
he's not dishonest he is just incredible naive. GW simply does not know what the truth is. he has not been in touch with reality in such a long time he does not know what is actually happening here at home let alone in the rest of the world.
his ignorance of the truth is what makes him so dangerous.
2007-12-14 15:04:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by michr 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
like he graduated yale. right. are you a fool. if i drop something does it go down. wheres the proof.
oh what about "i have no arrest", then right before the election "oh i forgot i was plastered and on coke and got arrested for driving wildly drunk" . the guys a liar and it you don't see that your just stupid and a lemming. try thinking for once.
STOP SMOKING THAT CRACK.
2007-12-14 15:07:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
where's the proof???? have you been in a coma the last 7 years. Do your own research. The truth is out there waiting for you to discover what most other already have.
2007-12-14 15:01:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
7⤊
4⤋
Where's the proof that he's honest? He promised the American public that this war would take only a few months. Here we are, almost 5 years later, and there is no end in sight. That's just the first thing that comes to my mind.
2007-12-14 14:57:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by katydid 7
·
7⤊
6⤋
The Bush haters are so irrational and hate Bush so much, that they forgot why.
The why is no longer important to them.
The fact that they hate Bush, irrespective of any facts, is the only thing that identifies them as people.
Without it, they are lost.
2007-12-14 15:00:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
Psychadelic P:
How about all the videos on YouTube that show key Democrats in Congress (like Hillary Clinton) saying that Saddam Hussein must be stopped?
Libs HATE it when facts get in the way of their fantasies.
2007-12-14 14:58:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
6⤋