If not , what make you think you understand so much of what the document means?
there is no person interpretation. and i feel to many ppl pretend to understand it
i know i havent studied it more then a few weeks every so often when i was in high school and very little in college, and can only understand to sort of know what its all about.
So why so many on this section seem to act like they were there writing it and totally get it?
i just think to many assume they know exactly whats every bit of it is about .
2007-12-14
14:41:35
·
11 answers
·
asked by
djominous20
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
hound mature you dont know me im dyslexic i dont use it as a crutch why do you use the fact mommy didnt hug you enough as yours
2007-12-14
14:48:20 ·
update #1
dolly not following what you mean can you explain
2007-12-14
14:55:48 ·
update #2
I've studied Constitutional law, have a law degree and I keep up with current rulings by the Supreme Court. Their job is to interpret the Constitution in a consistent manner so that we all continue to enjoy our freedoms.
But a document written in 1787 cannot specifically address all of the issues we have today and our society struggles to apply our general principles to these developing situations. We will not all agree. An unanimous Supreme Court decision is extremely rare. There's room for debate and for opposing opinions.
You don't have to be a scholar to know how you feel about freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, or the right to be secure from an unlawful search and seizure. The men who wrote and passed the Constitution included farmers, manufacturers, importers and tradesmen.
You don't need a degree to "hold these truths to be self-evident". Heck, you don't even have to be an American.
But I do agree that there are a lot of people who could do with a little more studying before they put an ill-considered opinion in print. Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
2007-12-14 15:11:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by raichasays 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The questions that I have answered in regards to Constitutional Law were right up my alley as they were dealing with search and seizure, Miranda Advisements, etc., and I am former law enforcement so was trained on these topics in depth. Additionally, I am a certified paralegal (from an ABA- American Bar Association approved school, not a weak no-name mail-in or Local Tech School) and had to study Constitutional Law as part of the curriculum, as well as the theory behind it, etc. Not to mention, I have the text somewhere here in my bookshelf that I can refer back to which has the text of the Constitution.
2007-12-14 14:48:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by jarrgen 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
There isn't a degree in constitutional law. There is a degree in law with lots of study in constitutional law. Other than that you're correct, there are lots of way to interpret the constitution.So many that not even the Supreme Court agrees on how to do it.
2007-12-14 14:58:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by StressedLawStudent 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the same reason people quote the bible. The bible can be interpreted in many ways and so can politics. Religion and politics are highly personal and people are entitled to practice their beliefs in the US. A degree in political science doesn't make one an expert. There are too many different perspectives and interpretations.
2007-12-14 14:46:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by katydid 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Gallaudet is seen an particularly solid college, and that i see no reason you are able to desire to no longer flow directly to regulation college or to a various style of masters degree. regulation faculties do no longer care what you majored in. Your being Deaf does no longer be seen as an argument - if something, it will make you a extra interesting candidate. in case you your self don't sense you're yet waiting to flow to regulation college, than possibly get a job in the US, possibly with a no longer-for-income organization that bargains with the two immigration subject concerns, or subject concerns for Deaf human beings. initiate exploring your profession interests by utilising utilising this style of role, and then flow directly to regulation college. you're welcome to take the LSAT as quickly as you're arranged. i think of it extremely is sweet for a pair of years in case you finally end up taking it. yet prep for it first. the two take an LSAT prep classification (Gallaudet would grant one), or get some prep books and flow by way of them.
2016-10-11 07:53:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will not discuss my degrees, However not just an understanding of the Document , but a deep respect for it.
2007-12-14 14:48:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not likely that you will run into very many constitutional scholars here but that does not mean the subject is closed for discussion. All you can hope for is to run into the occasional person that knows more about it than you do and I suspect that is very likely.
Edit: Hound.....That was hysterical
2007-12-14 14:48:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You should put down the Constitution and try Hooked on Phonics for a bit.
2007-12-14 14:46:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by hound 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Have you ever had to write it ten times for each Amendment? It is not permissible, learning is not used for punishment.
2007-12-14 14:51:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by dollysj 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question. There is a group in Washington, whose job is to try to figure it out, and they still haven't.
That group is the Supreme court.
2007-12-14 14:50:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
3⤊
1⤋