What Presidential Canidate wants to take away the No Child left behind act?
2007-12-14 13:49:38 · 8 answers · asked by Trish P 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
All of them. But you can't take away something that doesn't even exist.
2007-12-14 13:54:02 · answer #1 · answered by David M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
unlawful immigration motives many problems it somewhat is for particular. it somewhat is an straightforward certainty. Given your estimate of 20 million illegals enable's proceed from there. enable's say even a million/3 of them are retaining jobs. it somewhat is only approximately 7 million human beings interior the artwork rigidity. Contributing to the tax base etc. that should leave 7 million job vacancies. might our united states have the skill to handle that many leaving the artwork rigidity? possibly no longer. might human beings step into those jobs for the pay offered? possibly no longer. companies final analysis is income. might they develop wages to get human beings to artwork those jobs? possibly no longer. greater companies might start to outsource. subsequently leaving many human beings out of jobs that now carry jobs. Our finished united states might fall down and the great melancholy might appear as if a cakewalk. As i've got reported unlawful immigration is erroneous and needs to end. yet we additionally must be lifelike on deporting as you assert 20 million human beings. have faith me...it could no longer ensue for numerous motives. So we ought to circulate forward and think of of lifelike suggestion on a thank you to handle the placement to hand and additionally insure the unlawful subject is stemmed interior the destiny. greater valuable border risk-free practices and visa platforms must be dealt with first and maximum efficient so the placement would not steadily worsen. as quickly as the circulate is stopped we can then artwork on what to do with those already right here.
2016-11-27 01:03:19 · answer #2 · answered by kobayashi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't know right off, since all haven't checked all their published plans or issue positions yet - and that's what I suggest you do to find out. Offhand, I imagine any candidate who promotes true federalism and removing the government from areas where it has no real authority, would support removal of NCLB even if they don't explicitly say so.
2007-12-14 13:55:37 · answer #3 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they all (or a great majority) want to improve it and change in, since it has been shown not to work and teachers and administrators are not behind it.......all of the deomcrats want it to change the most, but they all agree that some of the policies are good ones and that all schools should be performing at a higher level than they are currently.
2007-12-14 13:54:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Michael Jackson!
2007-12-14 15:12:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It has a nice name but it is a joke. Just like 'homeland security'.
All of the candidates want it changed.
2007-12-14 13:57:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully the CANDIDATE who wins.
2007-12-14 14:14:55 · answer #7 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully a smart one... it's not working.
2007-12-14 13:57:28 · answer #8 · answered by justntime2c 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋