Maybe he meant insane, like the other guy you mentioned.
Or are you taking things out of context again?
2007-12-14 13:51:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by wichitaor1 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Why did 29 year CIA field commander ROBERT BAER say evidence points to 9/11 being a inside job??
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=rob...
5 minutes ago - 3 days left to answer.
Your question 3 minutes befor this one.
Take a pill and go to bed.
2007-12-14 13:58:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
While I didn't even want to consider that the Bush 'Maladministration' could have had anything to do with 9/11, the more I see of this inept 'Decider' the more uneasy I get.
What REALLY happened?
And what is happening to a once influential and respected country?
2007-12-14 14:06:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
For a million reasons, all of them with a picture of George Washington on the front
2007-12-14 13:59:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by phillipk_1959 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
gotta create some buzz because retirement is boring..join a conspiracy group-- maybe get famous and noticed...so sad
even sadder that some get obsessed with tripe and missout on a fun filled normal life..
2007-12-14 14:00:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by cyansure 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
The man has a grudge against the CIA. He is full of himself. If you are a like minded person, think of the facts. It was not possible to be an inside job. I don't think much about our Government but they did not do this.
2007-12-14 13:53:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sasha 5
·
7⤊
3⤋
Go to this site and you will see a hell of a lot more of them;
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
Raymond L. McGovern – Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates, CIA, responsible for preparing the President’ Daily Brief (PDB) for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. 27-year CIA veteran. Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer.
Video 7/22/06: "I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 report is a joke. The question is: What’s being covered up? Is it gross malfeasance, gross negligence, misfeasance? … Now there are a whole bunch of unanswered questions. And the reason they’re unanswered is because this administration will not answer the questions. … I just want to reassert, what Scott [Ritter, former Major in the U.S. Marines Corps, former Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq] said and this is the bottom line for me, just as Hitler in 1933 cynically exploited the burning of the parliament building, the Reichstag, this is exactly what our President did in exploiting 9/11. The cynical way in which he played on our trauma, used it to justify attacking, making a war of aggression on a country that he knew had nothing to do with 9/11. That suffices for me, I think Scott is exactly right, that’s certainly an impeachable offense." http://video.google
Endorsement of 9/11 and American Empire (Vol I) – Intellectuals Speak Out: "It has long been clear that the Bush-Cheney administration cynically exploited the attacks of 9/11 to promote its imperial designs. But the present volume confronts us with compelling evidence for an even more disturbing conclusion: that the 9/11 attacks were themselves orchestrated by this administration precisely so they could be thus exploited. If this is true, it is not merely the case, as the Downing Street memos show, that the stated reason for attacking Iraq was a lie. It is also the case that the whole 'war on terror' was based on a prior deception." http://www.interlinkbooks.com
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article
Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_mcgovern
2007-12-14 13:52:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
7⤋
He didn't get his gold watch at retirement and now wants to make money off a conspiracy theory book?
2007-12-14 13:52:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by David M 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
Because he's a wack job?
2007-12-14 13:52:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
As he said he approached it not willing to believe it was......yet after LOOKING at the evidence has since concluded it seems likely it was!
2007-12-14 13:56:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jeff S 7
·
1⤊
5⤋