English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bill Clinton only made 200k per year. Do you think Bush is performing twice as well as Clinton did?

2007-12-14 13:34:31 · 13 answers · asked by David M 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 answers

I think they should link presidential wages to deficits/surpluses, debt/reserve ratios, and a relative quantity of raising or lowering taxes.

By my standards, I would have given Clinton something between 150 and 225, where as Bush, 50max, practically owes money.

2007-12-14 13:45:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonimo 5 · 4 1

The President doesnt make 400K per year.....go learn correct facts!

2016-05-24 00:31:10 · answer #2 · answered by bev 3 · 0 0

Bush has twice the problems that Clinton had thanks to the mess Clinton left behind. Clinton tried to make up for his puny salary by renting out the Lincoln Bedroom and receiving kickbacks from missile technology sales to Red China.

2007-12-14 18:18:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This again? In 2000 Clinton signed the pay raise. Don't believe me? Look it up. It was Clinton that did that, not Bush.

2007-12-14 13:54:38 · answer #4 · answered by emp 6 · 3 2

Actually with per diem and allowances it is $2 million a year.

2007-12-14 17:30:05 · answer #5 · answered by wcowell2000 6 · 1 0

400K for the most visible leader of the free world ??? And 28 million for Roger Clemens???? Well, Roger didn't have a good year either.

2007-12-14 15:38:18 · answer #6 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0 1

He's getting more cus he deserves more.But It's kinda sad that the leader of the free world(Regardless of party) gets paid less then some C.E.O's .

2007-12-14 18:25:11 · answer #7 · answered by ak6702 7 · 0 0

If you knew what was really going on in this world,like all former Presidents do !!! Yeah !! I'd say they've earned it !!!
Why do you think their hair turn's white,over a 4 yr. period??

2007-12-14 17:11:37 · answer #8 · answered by Bow-legged Snake 6 · 1 0

Bush doesn't deserve the money for sure.

2007-12-14 14:18:16 · answer #9 · answered by ch_ris_l 5 · 1 1

hahah no! bill clinton is way better...i hope he isnt earning that much! he doesnt deserve it

2007-12-14 13:42:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers