English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The issue should be, who has the strongest experience and support network.

2007-12-14 13:20:31 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

18 answers

We the public have no option but to choose the better of the worst. So we are aware that they are fraud - but have no option

2007-12-14 14:07:43 · answer #1 · answered by spice 5 · 0 0

Actually, not all do. You just never here about the ones that dont because they don't make it too far in the political world.

As a whole, we don't look hard enough at our leaders. We just choose the one that we think has ideals that match ours the closest. We really should watch more of the political debates, check there voting records and not be a single issue voter.

So many people say, I will never vote Democrat or I will never vote republican. That attitude prevents honest politicians from making it far in the political world. They need to please the majority. The majority doesnt agree on anything. Its a messed up system but currently, it is the best in the world.

2007-12-14 13:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by Scott M 4 · 0 0

i do no longer believe it is genuine, and it takes some severe thinking skills to look below the exterior at their record to align what they are saying to what they have achieved. If there is extra congruence than no longer, you probable have a enormously honest person. Governing isn't something achieved by making use of somebody, and numerous compromises would desire to be made to get help to get subjects for the period of the channels, so sturdy positions that get somebody electec usually would desire to be changed in prepare. back, seek for congruance and consistency. cwstuffff, no longer everybody interior the bible belt is fooled by making use of cheating politicians, and besides, the present president does no longer have been elected had each and every of the states no longer supported his stupid *** the way they did--the bible belt did no longer decide for him. electorate in each and every of the states supported him to the element the place one state introduced the tie-breaker. i believe the election became into stolen, yet it is yet another concern. The bible belt gets ripped for each thing incorrect with the rustic, however the vast majority of the inhabitants isn't interior the bible belt, and that assertion provides plenty extra ability to a small inhabitants than it merits. do no longer scapegoat the bible belt. There are as many smart electorate right here as everywhere else.

2016-11-03 07:44:25 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Howard and his spin doctors and speech writers fooled whole Australia with lies, lies and fear. On the other side Mr Rudd and his team were more honest and they won because people believed in Rudd's congruency rather than Mr Howard's scaremongering . They will learn when during a world recession LABOR under Keating keep the country going with big reforms ,,,,,where as Howard rode the wave of the minerals boom & did nothing at the same level as during the bad old Menzies times.

2007-12-14 21:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It's really too bad that our country has gone back to the days of the original 13 colonies. We really are taxed without representation. I know we have senators and state representatives, but I'm a disabled veteran who can't get a job due to my disability, who has written both of the above mentioned, and not heard a peep back from any of them in over two years. I heard it perfectly once from a college professor I had. "Democracy is like a person. Everyone loves it when it's a young, because it's full of life and new. But when it gets old, it's like a cranky old man that's stubborn and won't listen to anyone."

2007-12-14 13:25:43 · answer #5 · answered by trevors30 3 · 0 0

Rudd and his spin doctors and speech writers fooled whole Australia with lies, lies and lies. On the other side Mr Howard and his team were more honest and they lost because people rather believed in Rudd's lies than Mr Howards honest assessment. They will learn when interest rates, inflation and unemployment will rise to the same level as during the bad old Keating times.

2007-12-14 13:27:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No the issue should be that if your statement is true, then we need to vote ALL of the incumbents OUT of office regardless of whether or not they are related to the late John F Kennedy or regardless of who our parents vote for blindly.

2007-12-14 13:24:02 · answer #7 · answered by Joe F 7 · 1 0

I don't think they all do that - there was a sighting of an honest politician somewhere in Romania in the late 80s - unconfirmed,

2007-12-14 14:10:43 · answer #8 · answered by All hat 7 · 0 0

I think this fact is why so many people don't vote. They are all crap. I vote the green party cos then I'm not voting for a shitty politician, I'm voting for a colour, or the planet, or something.

2007-12-14 13:32:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lincoln said that, "You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

2007-12-14 13:23:50 · answer #10 · answered by DR W 7 · 1 0

The people who vote for them to power.

2007-12-14 22:29:19 · answer #11 · answered by Orange_5775 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers