Now THAT would show goodwill toward men.
2007-12-14 12:17:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
No, it would be HORRID, if only because the impeachment of Bush would give us President CHENEY. As pathetic as Bush is, I prefer HIM over Cheney (bites tongue as he types this.)
2007-12-14 16:00:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by acermill 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Now wish for something realistic like Hillary loosing the Iowa caucus.
2007-12-14 12:13:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by WhatAmI? 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
For the Umpteenth million time George bush has not broken any laws...That would be like somebody throwing you in jail because they disagreed with your politics..
2007-12-14 12:16:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
It be better then the presents we been getting from him
the past few years.....
2007-12-14 12:43:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jbuckeye 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. Presidents are not perfect human beings, and this one is a lame duck. It is too late for an impeachment to be useful even if you don't like him.
2007-12-14 12:14:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by BruceN 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
Your awesome, because your anti bush. No but seriousely he's almost done So then we can have another dissapointing president. But the anti bush thing is soo annoying. yes, you are cool.
2007-12-14 12:14:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
If it had happened in 2003!
2007-12-14 12:25:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, we don't need another witch hunt like Ken Starr's.
2007-12-14 12:22:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by grumpyoldman 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why was he voted in a second time then?
2007-12-14 12:22:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sure, 5 Christmas' ago, now it'd just be idotic and a waste of time, and god knows congress wastes enough time.
2007-12-14 12:13:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by S P 6
·
3⤊
3⤋