2007-12-14 11:54:25 · 13 answers · asked by Philip P 3 in Sports ➔ Basketball
dwight for duncan yes. only because duncan has so many weapons and is coasting... plus "Pop" has been resting duncan and letting manu and tony do the scoring. Dwight... man he's tearing it up. i have him on my fantasy team and i've been destroying match ups solely on his games. t-mac is sooooo injury prone it wouldn't be worth it while kobe plays thru any injury. if you can get dwight for duncan do it... but do not trade kobe for tracy.
2007-12-14 12:10:43 · answer #1 · answered by Nick C (IT'S SHOWTIME!!) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a great trade. Duncan's injured and kobe's not having his best year. T mac is a scoring machine and dwight is a young shaq
2007-12-14 11:59:07 · answer #2 · answered by Nicholas C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm no you shouldnt, tim duncan is the most respected player in the NBA, and avaregas 18.7 points a game, while kobe avarages 28.7 points a game. So no its not a good trade.
2007-12-14 11:57:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huge trade, but not a chance I would take it. Therre are no other consistant scorers in LA and Duncan is still a top tier player.
2007-12-14 11:58:11 · answer #4 · answered by poolman4u03 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no tim duncan is awesome
i love the spurs and he's on the spurs
t mac hasn't been doin so great lately anyways
2007-12-14 11:57:17 · answer #5 · answered by KBBALL20 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you should defnitely do it. Duncans injured and Kobe is amazing but Howard and T-Mac are averagin more ppg.
2007-12-14 11:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by mark 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Tracy is past his prime even though he's still in his 20's. Dunacn for Howard I might do.
2007-12-14 12:00:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no.
Kobe is obviously better than McGrady.
Tim Duncan is very consistent.Dwight is still learning.
2007-12-14 12:08:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
post a link
2007-12-14 11:56:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
only Kobe for T-Mac and didn't you ask this question before?
2007-12-14 11:58:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋