When the worst terrorist attack in the world came on the republicans watch?
2007-12-14 10:49:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
fraginal------why did Bush ignore national security until after we were attcked?
2007-12-14 11:04:44 · update #1
With 9/11 happening on their boy dumbya's watch, republicans come off as the weakest party on national security and defense. (nice how those borders have been secured)
2007-12-14 10:54:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
It's not like democrats can do anything about it, they ARE weak on national security. There was a record number of attacks on American interests under Clinton and 9/11 was planned under Clinton. We've had no more since Bush took the fight to the terrorists after 9/11.
2007-12-14 11:36:09 · answer #2 · answered by T D 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
don't know why I bother to answer these stupid questions.your hero slick(clinton) willy was in office for 8 yrs. and let the terrorists have their way.meantime,slick had his way playing with interns.lets see if your smart enough to figure out why 9/11 happened. wake up !
2007-12-14 11:49:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes and according to Liberals terrorists just need a Big Hug. Get real!
2007-12-14 10:55:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Republicans are good on national security and foreign diplomacy.
2007-12-14 10:57:27 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You could just think of it like this:
Conservatives and Republicans = Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Liberals and democrats = Pewee Herman.
I hope that clears things up a bit for you.
2007-12-14 10:55:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Dems will care about terrorism only when terrorists target polar bears with suicide sleds.
2007-12-14 10:53:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋