What's wrong with National Healthcare?

Question

What's wrong with National Healthcare? Having the HMO's and PPO's just give big business another means to control our lives! Maybe that's because if people didn't like their jobs, they could just quit and move on. IIs big business afraid of having empowered employees? If we had National Healthcare we could once and for all reduce the complexity of of healthcare! Is it so wrong the we as citizens have the right to healthcare? I'm tired of people using the Constitution, etc. as an excuse. Shouldn't healthcare be part of our unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Just maybe Canada, England, and Europe just might have it right. Why can't there be a balance between the power of big business and the American People?

Don't just list complaints about other countries' problems. Try to list some positive things to. If you don't that means that you're being one-sided. I know that there are problems that other countries have. But, if we are the greatest nation, why can't we do better?

Answer 1

It will knock big business and the rule of the pharmaceuticals over.

Answer 2

Socialized healthcare would be the single most personally disempowering thing you could do to yourself. You would forfeit your right to chose who to go to for treatment. The government would tell you. It would be an HMO from hell.
Worse, the government would first decide whether your desired treatment was warranted, or cost effective. Meaning that, if they didn't think your life was worth saving, they could deny service. That's what they have to do in all the countries you listed above. They simply do not have the capacity to treat everyone at the same time.
So how much do you think your grandmothers life is worth (to them, not you)? Senior Citizens in particular should be concerned about this. Do you really want some anonymous LPN with a minor in Accounting to decide whether you or your loved one lives or dies?
To assume that the government is going to work for your benefit instead of their own is absurd, niave and potentially dangerous. Nationalized Healthcare is a false morality which presents tyranny as compassion. Don't be so gullible.

Answer 3

We already have national healthcare...The issue that you're being sold under the guise of emotional hype is national health INSURANCE.

If you're really worried about how Big Business is screwing the public, please check to see which party is in bed with the insurance companies and the trial lawyers that keep your rates high...

And you're worried about complexity? Have you read the Tax Code recently? How 'bout getting an appointment at the DMV. Know any veterans? Ask them how personal and caring the treatment is at the VA.

What could be less complex than government care going to those truly in need, while those with means be responsible for their own care...

If the government wants to get involved, let them incentivize private practice doctors with greater protection from frivolous lawsuits. Let them allow hard working Americans to put away more money for their retirement and their own insurance policies without forcing them to bear the burden of more taxes and expenses. Let them say NO to money from insurance and pharmeceutical lobbies and listen more to their taxpaying constituents.

Instead of further institutionalizing and depersonalizing health care, how about creating an environment where every American has the right to form a personal relationship with a Doctor, instead of a call center?

Answer 4

He is why Universal Health care is wrong.

First of all, you would be creating another BIG Government agency, this would require continous funding and with the graying of America, more money would be needed, with less taxpayers footing the bill

Second, Medical advancments, like any other industry, are driven by competition, no competition, no reason to work harder, no advances.

Third, anyplace that universal healthcare has been enacted, it has failed, furthermore, private hospitals, clinics and practices have been set up. These private sources of health care, are expensive, profitable and can only be accessed by those who have money. This results in a system, similar to our education system where, most services provided by public entities are substandard or adequate at best and the cream of the crop (health care professionals) will flock to private institutions rather than provide services at public institutions. Thus the one reason to given to provide public healthcare will actually reduce the access to most of the public that they now enjoy.

Answer 5

National healthcare, the way you describe it, would be run by the government. The government makes a mess of most things it runs.

Healthcare is no more an unalienable right than eating is it? And eating is not a right. How about we feed all Americans before we start worrying about healthcare?!

Answer 6

1. It's unconstitutional! There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States for the federal government to interfere in our health care.

2. The federal government's interference is the reason health care is so expensive already.

3. Do you want to trust your health care to the same government that has lied about socialist insecurity?

4. With no limits on coverage this will become just another Black Hole for the federal politicians to throw the monay they steal from working Americans into.

5. What has the federal government done right recently that makes so many people want to trust them with health care?

6. Why should I have to pay for someone else's health care if I can't tell them how to live?

Answer 7

There are several things wrong with it.
First, the government would be in charge of it. When's the last time the government had control of something that it didn't make more complicated, or just generally screw up?
Second, any time you make something free, the demand goes up, increasing the waiting period to get treatment.
Third, and probably most importantly, someone has to pay for it. Where do you think the government gets it's money?
From the tax payer, of course.
You will end up paying for your own health care one way or another.
Fourth, any time the government provides something to you, someone always wants them to do it cheaper. So, they will always be trying to control your health so that you don't need so much "free" health care.
Do you really want the government checking to see if you're living according to their specs?

Answer 8

The national healthcare for the undesirable is inadequate and over-under pressure commonly catering to unlawful populations before electorate, i assume by using fact whilst using undesirable for guinea pigs, illegals won't be able to *****. Socialized drugs is a great ingredient. it somewhat is unlike HMO's which many working human beings have and that are protecting fees for the corps. fairly than pondering the customer. In some international places, like Germany and Switzerland, final I heard, there grew to become into no socialized drugs, yet fairly than charity hospitals the place all the undesirable could desire to circulate, each and every company has to insure their workers with good insurance and additionally has to pay good wages. fees for insurance are no longer outrageous and neither are scientific fees. this manner, the few who're uninsured are able to circulate to any well being facility or medical institution whilst necessary as long as they are electorate or criminal citizens. scientific care is seen a human maximum appropriate fairly than a privilege in maximum Western international places. I accept as true with this. i've got faith the device in u . s . a . concerning scientific care is broken. If a guy or woman has somewhat solid insurance, then they are in possibility of being over-dealt with to their very own detriment. Our scientific device is greed based and that advantages no one aside from the wealthy and very wealthy. too lots to speak approximately in one posting, yet i think of it somewhat is gloomy between the wealthier international places interior the international operates via way of "survival of the fittest" by using fact incredibly lots all of us is undertaking to catastrophic ailment or harm that should reason a reveral of fortune and then they're going to understand why our device is BROKE and inept.

Answer 9

Unfortunately, national health care doesn't guarantee better health care.

The four areas where Canada's health care system is lacking are as follows:
1. Excessive waiting times
2. Lack of resources
3. Inadequate funding
4. Lack of home, pharmaceutical, and long-term care

Answer 10

We already have national healthcare.

Socialized healthcare is socialism and health care at it's worst.