English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How long was she in the Senate?

2007-12-14 08:00:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

It's what politicians do; they backstab each other to get into office

2007-12-14 08:04:28 · answer #1 · answered by . 3 · 2 0

Clinton loves to have her campaign people spread rumors about her Democratic opponents. Then she claims no knowledge, time and again. She has claimed she knows things about Obama and is threatening to speak out when the time is right, the claims against Obama and a slush fund came from her campaign, as well as the idea that he may have even sold drugs.

Just what presidential experience does she have? What type of executive experience does Hillary have? The only experience she has is being a terrible first lady to Bill. What gives her the right to be so vindictive?

Abraham Lincoln once said,"You cannot strengthen the weak to weaken the strong!"

If this is her agenda someone should advise her that this doesn't work.

BTW a lot of the people who used to work for her campaign, have left Hillary, and now work for Obama!

.

.

2007-12-14 16:13:27 · answer #2 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 1 0

She is going on 8 years in the Senate. How many years in the Senate did George W. Bush have? How many has Rudy Giuliani had? Maybe we need a change. People whine about Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton so maybe we can make that happen by electing Obama, for example. A fresh face with a fresh approach might be good. There were a bunch of fuddy duddys in office for many years prior to 1960 and then along came a freshman Senator from Massachusettes, young, good looking and with a different approach to things. Unfortunately he was gunned down and another fuddy duddy took over. Perhaps we need a young vibrant president to embody that youth and vitality that JFK had some 48 years ago.

2007-12-14 16:09:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

That's so funny, I was just scratching my head at the tv about that last night. According to her she has 35 years of experience. I guess it works like common property for married couples.
Nothing against Hillary, but it's a very odd approach for her to take.

2007-12-14 17:56:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hillary is not the only person bringing it up. Andrew Young of Georgia said that Obama is too young and not experienced enough to be president. And he was a Foot soldier for Martin Luther King, Jr.

2007-12-14 16:09:55 · answer #5 · answered by Michael M 6 · 1 1

Well, Hillary has had more experience in Washington then Obama. That's why I like Obama. Maybe we need someone that isn't in everyone's pocket already.

2007-12-14 16:09:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why is the Senate any proof of experience? It only proves you can campaign. It doesn't prove you are a leader, qualified to run the largest business in the world.

2007-12-14 16:03:55 · answer #7 · answered by JonB 5 · 4 0

Maybe she feels like she was in charge when Bill was the president. I'm just glad those two are the best candidates they have to offer.

2007-12-14 16:48:02 · answer #8 · answered by Larry 4 · 1 0

Experience while an advantage is not needed in order to be a good President.

2007-12-14 16:03:19 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 2

Apparently, the Hildebeest believes that it is possible for one to gain experience by injection.

2007-12-14 16:08:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers